public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code
@ 2012-03-31 0:35 gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
2012-04-02 9:16 ` [Bug c/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se @ 2012-03-31 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Bug #: 52802
Summary: Equality rewrites pessimizes code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: gcc@magfr.user.lysator.liu.se
I have a function (in foo.c)
unsigned f(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
if (a < 8)
return a;
else if (a == 8)
return b;
else
return 4711;
}
that GCC compiles to (x86_64, -Os)
cmpl $7, %edi #, a
movl %edi, %eax # a, a
jbe .L2 #,
cmpl $8, %edi #, a
movl $4711, %eax #, tmp63
cmove %esi, %eax # b,, a
.L2:
ret
Here it is confusing to see that it starts by doing a "cmp $7, %edi" and then
goes on to do a "cmp $8, %edi" since I never said anything but 8, so the big
question is why there are two compares.
The reason seems to be premature optimization. The C parser tries to minimize
the value of all comparision values so that -fdump-tree-original shows
;; Function f (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
{
if (a <= 7)
{
return a;
}
else
{
if (a == 8)
{
return b;
}
else
{
return 4711;
}
}
}
and there the 7 have magically appeared.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
@ 2012-04-02 9:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 9:43 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-02 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2012-04-02
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-02 09:16:20 UTC ---
How would you do with a single compare?!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
2012-04-02 9:16 ` [Bug c/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-02 9:43 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-04-02 10:29 ` [Bug target/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2012-04-02 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2012-04-02 09:43:03 UTC ---
On x86, mov and jcc don't clobber the flags, so the first cmpl should compare
with 8 not 7, the jbe should be adjusted to jb, and then the second cmpl is
redundant as the flags from the first cmpl are still available.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
2012-04-02 9:16 ` [Bug c/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 9:43 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2012-04-02 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-02 18:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-05 21:42 ` [Bug middle-end/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-02 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Target| |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|c |target
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-02 10:28:58 UTC ---
Confirmed. On the tree level we canonicalize things which is good, if
you change the source to what the canonicalization looks like you get the
same problem.
Target issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-02 10:29 ` [Bug target/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-02 18:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-05 21:42 ` [Bug middle-end/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-02 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Last reconfirmed|2012-04-02 00:00:00 |2021-8-2
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We miss this also for aarch64:
cmp w0, 7
bls .L1
cmp w0, 8
mov w0, 4711
csel w0, w1, w0, eq
.L1:
ret
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-02 18:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-08-05 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-05 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|rtl-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if we could change `a <= 7` back to `a < 8` in isel if we notice we do
another comparison in either branch against `a` and `8`.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-05 21:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-31 0:35 [Bug c/52802] New: Equality rewrites pessimizes code gcc at magfr dot user.lysator.liu.se
2012-04-02 9:16 ` [Bug c/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 9:43 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-04-02 10:29 ` [Bug target/52802] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-02 18:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-05 21:42 ` [Bug middle-end/52802] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).