* [Bug c++/53135] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-27 6:00 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com
2012-07-13 7:29 ` [Bug debug/53135] " dushistov at mail dot ru
` (20 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: raj.khem at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-27 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |arm-oe-linux-gnueabi
Known to fail| |4.7.0, 4.7.1
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail dot com> 2012-04-27 05:59:56 UTC ---
testcase
class QAbstractFileEngine
{
public:
enum FileFlag {
ReadOwnerPerm = 0x4000, WriteOwnerPerm = 0x2000, ExeOwnerPerm = 0x1000,
ReadUserPerm = 0x0400, WriteUserPerm = 0x0200, ExeUserPerm = 0x0100,
ReadGroupPerm = 0x0040, WriteGroupPerm = 0x0020, ExeGroupPerm = 0x0010,
ReadOtherPerm = 0x0004, WriteOtherPerm = 0x0002, ExeOtherPerm = 0x0001,
};
bool setPermissions(unsigned int perms);
};
extern const char* str;
extern bool foo(const char*, int);
bool QAbstractFileEngine::setPermissions(unsigned int perms)
{
bool ret = false;
int mode = 0;
if (perms & ReadOwnerPerm)
mode |= 0400;
if (perms & WriteOwnerPerm)
mode |= 0200;
if (perms & ExeOwnerPerm)
mode |= 0100;
if (perms & ReadUserPerm)
mode |= 0400;
if (perms & WriteUserPerm)
mode |= 0200;
if (perms & ExeUserPerm)
mode |= 0100;
if (perms & ReadGroupPerm)
mode |= (0400 >> 3);
if (perms & WriteGroupPerm)
mode |= (0200 >> 3);
if (perms & ExeGroupPerm)
mode |= (0100 >> 3);
if (perms & ReadOtherPerm)
mode |= ((0400 >> 3) >> 3);
if (perms & WriteOtherPerm)
mode |= ((0200 >> 3) >> 3);
if (perms & ExeOtherPerm)
mode |= ((0100 >> 3) >> 3);
ret = foo(str, mode) == 0;
return ret;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
2012-04-27 6:00 ` [Bug c++/53135] " raj.khem at gmail dot com
@ 2012-07-13 7:29 ` dushistov at mail dot ru
2012-07-13 7:41 ` [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: dushistov at mail dot ru @ 2012-07-13 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov at mail dot ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dushistov at mail dot ru
--- Comment #2 from Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov at mail dot ru> 2012-07-13 07:29:22 UTC ---
I think that it should be marked as regression.
Because of qt 4.6.3 give such error message with gcc 4.7.1,
but with gcc 4.2 all works fine.
Can anybody with suitable permissions mark this bug as regression?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
2012-04-27 6:00 ` [Bug c++/53135] " raj.khem at gmail dot com
2012-07-13 7:29 ` [Bug debug/53135] " dushistov at mail dot ru
@ 2012-07-13 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-14 22:18 ` dushistov at mail dot ru
` (18 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-13 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.2.4
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.7/4.8 Regression]
|value_format, at |internal compiler error: in
|dwarf2out.c:8010 |value_format, at
| |dwarf2out.c:8010
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-13 7:41 ` [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-14 22:18 ` dushistov at mail dot ru
2012-07-15 18:36 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (17 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: dushistov at mail dot ru @ 2012-07-14 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #3 from Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov at mail dot ru> 2012-07-14 22:18:12 UTC ---
I searched commit which cause error.
Here is result of running test from this bugreport, with such command:
arm-none-eabi-g++ -O2 -g -c /tmp/test.cpp
good:
r182757 | paolo | 2011-12-31 21:29:30 +0400 (Сб., 31 дек. 2011) | 14 lines
the next one in the trunk
bad:
r182760 | aoliva | 2012-01-01 00:02:48 +0400 (Вс., 01 янв. 2012) | 26 lines
Can anybody add "aoliva" to "CC List"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-14 22:18 ` dushistov at mail dot ru
@ 2012-07-15 18:36 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-07-24 13:03 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2012-07-15 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2012-07-15 18:35:32 UTC ---
The ICE still occurs with gcc 4.8 r189496 and 4.7 r189484, but with 4.8 it's
now masked by default by Jakub's r186835, -g -gdwarf-3 is needed to trigger it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-15 18:36 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2012-07-24 13:03 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-07 1:55 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-24 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-07-24
CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-24 13:03:00 UTC ---
on trunk with -O2 -g -gdwarf-3 I can reproduce the ICE .
{dw_attr = DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value, dw_attr_val = {val_class =
dw_val_class_loc, v = {val_addr = 0xb74576b4, val_offset =
12659530246790674100, val_loc_list = 0xb74576b4, val_loc = 0xb74576b4, val_int
= -5787213826918877516, val_unsigned = 12659530246790674100, val_double = {low
= 12659530246790674100, high = -5787213827046133841}, val_vec = {array =
0xb74576b4 "\350vE\267\n", length = 2947526575, elt_size = 2947526575},
val_die_ref = {die = 0xb74576b4, external = -1347440721}, val_fde_index =
3074782900, val_str = 0xb74576b4, val_lbl_id = 0xb74576b4 "\350vE\267\n",
val_flag = 180 '\264', val_file = 0xb74576b4, val_data8 =
"\264vE\267\257\257\257\257", val_decl_ref = 0xb74576b4, val_vms_delta = {lbl1
= 0xb74576b4 "\350vE\267\n", lbl2 = 0xafafafaf <Address 0xafafafaf out of
bounds>}}}}
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x8e9bd35 "in %s, at %s:%d") at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/diagnostic.c:955
#1 0x08c1c31f in fancy_abort (file=0x8cc24e8
"/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/dwarf2out.c", line=7467,
function=0x8cc21e7 "value_format") at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/diagnostic.c:1011
#2 0x0846054b in value_format (a=0xb7a329c0) at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7467
#3 0x0847fdaf in output_value_format (filename=0xbffff4de "/tmp/tst.cc") at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7572
#4 output_abbrev_section (filename=0xbffff4de "/tmp/tst.cc") at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7605
#5 dwarf2out_finish (filename=0xbffff4de "/tmp/tst.cc") at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/dwarf2out.c:22463
#6 0x08722b5a in compile_file () at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/toplev.c:594
#7 0x08724934 in do_compile (argc=5, argv=0xbffff2f4) at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/toplev.c:1863
#8 toplev_main (argc=5, argv=0xbffff2f4) at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/toplev.c:1939
#9 0x08c0defb in main (argc=5, argv=0xbffff2f4) at
/home/ramrad01/cross-build/fsf/src/gcc-pr54051/gcc/main.c:36
(gdb)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-24 13:03 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-07 1:55 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-07 2:28 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-07 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2012-07-24 00:00:00 |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-07 01:54:12 UTC ---
On it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-07 1:55 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-07 2:28 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-07 18:48 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-07 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-07 02:26:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27954
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27954
Patch that fixes (or works around?) the problem
We have a relatively large expression to represent the outgoing “mode”
parameter, computed from “perms”, that requires more than 64KiB to represent.
block2 is not enough for that. Jakub, is it intentional that we ICE in this
case, or is this patch a reasonable change? We successfully output the
location expression; surely 64KiB+ expressions might be excessive, but I don't
think an ICE is the most desirable way to deal with such large expressions if
we build them in the first place.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-07 2:28 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-07 18:48 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-07 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-07 18:47:16 UTC ---
For those running into the problem, analternative to patching GCC isto reduce
the maximum expression depth for var-traking with --param
max-vartrack-expr-depth=11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-07 18:48 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-20 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-07 11:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-20 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-20 14:03:39 UTC ---
Alex, the patch is ok for trunk and 4.7 branch. That said, with similar code
just appearing not in call site parameter, but in a .debug_loc section we'd ICE
anyway, as .debug_loc has a hard limit of 64K, and furthermore we should do a
better job on this testcase, instead of creating such a huge expression which
keeps recomputing the same values again and again introduce some kind of
temporaries in the expression, if some expression occurs more than a few times,
compute it into a temporary first (on the DWARF stack) and then just pick it
when needed, drop at the end.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-20 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-07 11:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-20 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-07 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-07 11:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-20 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-27 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-20 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-20 10:12:46 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-20 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-09-27 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-02 20:05 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-27 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-oe-linux-gnueabi |arm-*-linux-gnueabi
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-27 18:47:59 UTC ---
Ping.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-09-27 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-02 20:05 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-02 20:18 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-02 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-02 20:05:29 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:05:24 2012
New Revision: 192000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192000
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value_format): Use block4 for dw_val_class_loc
when needed.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-02 20:05 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-02 20:18 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-03 4:03 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-02 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-02 20:17:53 UTC ---
The work around is installed in the trunk, and will soon be in the branch as
well, but this should ideally be left open until we figure out a better way to
avoid all the duplication that triggers the size explosion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-02 20:18 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-03 4:03 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-20 6:25 ` [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf) law at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-03 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-03 04:02:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 3 04:02:38 2012
New Revision: 192021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192021
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value_format): Use block4 for dw_val_class_loc
when needed.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/dwarf2out.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-03 4:03 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-20 6:25 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-04-11 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2013-01-20 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Duplicate cause size |Duplicates cause size
|explosion (vta/dwarf) |explosion (vta/dwarf)
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2013-01-20 06:24:43 UTC ---
Removing regression marker as workaround is on trunk. Leaving open so we don't
lose track of this bug as we'd really like to do better.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-20 6:25 ` [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf) law at redhat dot com
@ 2013-04-11 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-11 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.7.4
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-11 07:58:37 UTC ---
GCC 4.7.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-11 7:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-04 20:26 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unsetting target milestone of open non-regression bug from version of branch
being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-04 20:26 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-05 1:04 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-05 8:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-04 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Since the fix got installed in 2012 this really should have been fixed from
4.8.0 onwards.
Should we really keep this still open or can we close this out ?
Ramana
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-04 20:26 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-05 1:04 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-05 8:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-05 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think it's just workaround that got installed in 2012, not a real fix. Of
course, 10 years later one could ask if the workaround has become the "real
fix".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug debug/53135] Duplicates cause size explosion (vta/dwarf)
2012-04-27 5:59 [Bug c++/53135] New: internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010 raj.khem at gmail dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-05 1:04 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-05 8:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-05 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #20 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19)
> I think it's just workaround that got installed in 2012, not a real fix.
> Of course, 10 years later one could ask if the workaround has become the
> "real fix".
That is of course a jolly good question :P
Ramana
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread