public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55656-4-T5TiZxqJ6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-07-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #0)

r200977 (mainline)
r200980 (4.8)
r200982 (4.7)

Should have resolved those issues related to interface changes. 

> 		=== obj-c++ tests ===
> 
> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/cxx-ivars-3.mm -fnext-runtime execution test

This is a real new fail - however, it remains to be seen what the origin is. 
The system (clang) compiler generates the same output as we do.  So (a) the
fault might lie in the vendor's library - or (b) the interface might have been
changed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-426297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jul 16 16:59:51 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7959 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2013 16:59:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5757 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jul 2013 16:57:49 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55657] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-55657-4-q8c7kMyHrJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00804.txt.bz2
Content-length: 936

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idU657

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-07-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #0)

r200977 (mainline)
r200980 (4.8)
r200982 (4.7)

Should have resolved those issues related to interface changes.

         === obj-c++ tests ==
> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.mm -fnext-runtime execution test

> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-13.mm -fgnu-runtime execution test

        === objc tests ==
> FAIL: objc.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.m -fnext-runtime execution test

these are real new failures, to be investigated.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-16 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: " howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-12 10:02 ` [Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-12 14:07 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2013-03-22 14:45 ` [Bug target/55656] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-31 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-16 16:44 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-10-16  9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-22 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22  9:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 22:28 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 23:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-08 22:02 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55656-4-T5TiZxqJ6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).