* [Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2012-12-12 10:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-12 14:07 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-12 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|objc/obj-c++ failures |[4.8 Regression]
|present under darwin11 |objc/obj-c++ failures
| |present under darwin11
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-12 10:01:27 UTC ---
I suppose these are all regressions?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-12 10:02 ` [Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-12 14:07 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2013-03-22 14:45 ` [Bug target/55656] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu @ 2012-12-12 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-12-12 14:07:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I suppose these are all regressions?
In the strict sense, no. These are due to changes in the Objective-C ABI in
later darwin SDKs. I haven't checked all of these yet, but I suspect most will
disappear is --systroot= is used to select the previous MacOS X SDK (e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-12/msg00586.html).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-12-12 10:02 ` [Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-12 14:07 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
@ 2013-03-22 14:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-31 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-03-22 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-22 14:44:17 UTC ---
GCC 4.8.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-22 14:45 ` [Bug target/55656] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-05-31 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-16 16:44 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-31 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-31 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-07-16 16:44 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-16 9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-16 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-07-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #0)
r200977 (mainline)
r200980 (4.8)
r200982 (4.7)
Should have resolved those issues related to interface changes.
> === obj-c++ tests ===
>
> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/cxx-ivars-3.mm -fnext-runtime execution test
This is a real new fail - however, it remains to be seen what the origin is.
The system (clang) compiler generates the same output as we do. So (a) the
fault might lie in the vendor's library - or (b) the interface might have been
changed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-426297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jul 16 16:59:51 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7959 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2013 16:59:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5757 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jul 2013 16:57:49 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/55657] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-55657-4-q8c7kMyHrJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00804.txt.bz2
Content-length: 936
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idU657
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-07-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #0)
r200977 (mainline)
r200980 (4.8)
r200982 (4.7)
Should have resolved those issues related to interface changes.
=== obj-c++ tests ==
> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.mm -fnext-runtime execution test
> FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-13.mm -fgnu-runtime execution test
=== objc tests ==
> FAIL: objc.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.m -fnext-runtime execution test
these are real new failures, to be investigated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-07-16 16:44 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-16 9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-22 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-16 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.2 |4.8.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-10-16 9:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-22 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 9:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-22 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.3 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-22 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-22 9:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 22:28 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-22 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed on master
e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-March/669584.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-22 9:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-22 22:28 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 23:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-08 22:02 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-22 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=55654
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> fixed on master
> e.g.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-March/669584.html
So... are we keeping this open for backports, then? If so, to which branches?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-22 22:28 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-22 23:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-08 22:02 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-22 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > fixed on master
> > e.g.
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-March/669584.html
>
> So... are we keeping this open for backports, then?
yes, most of the fixes are code-gen ones - so I think we need them on at least
one branch that can be built with c++98.
> If so, to which branches?
10.x .. not sure if it's necessary to go back further (let's see there might be
a subset of the changes that are worth doing).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug target/55656] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
2012-12-11 20:24 [Bug target/55656] New: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11 howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-22 23:11 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-08-08 22:02 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-08 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > > fixed on master
> > > e.g.
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-March/669584.html
> >
> > So... are we keeping this open for backports, then?
>
> yes, most of the fixes are code-gen ones - so I think we need them on at
> least one branch that can be built with c++98.
>
> > If so, to which branches?
>
> 10.x .. not sure if it's necessary to go back further (let's see there might
> be a subset of the changes that are worth doing).
10.x is closed now...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread