public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
@ 2013-01-23 20:44 vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:45 ` [Bug c++/56088] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-23 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

             Bug #: 56088
           Summary: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to
                    always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: vhaisman@gmail.com


Created attachment 29258
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29258
bug sources

I am seeing the following compilation/linking error that I am not seeing with
non-LTO builds:

--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<
In file included from :256:0:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/wchar2.h: In function
‘_ZN9__gnu_cxx12__to_xstringISbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEEwEET_PFiPT0_mPKS6_P13__va_list_tagEmS9_z.constprop.0’:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/wchar2.h:316:28: error: inlining failed in
call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
 __NTH (vswprintf (wchar_t *__restrict __s, size_t __n,
                            ^
In file included from
/home/wilx/gcc48/include/c++/4.8.0/bits/stl_algobase.h:3320:0,
                 from :1177:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/wchar2.h:322:50: error: called from here
   return __vswprintf_alias (__s, __n, __fmt, __ap);
                                                  ^
lto-wrapper: g++-4.8 returned 1 exit status
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: lto-wrapper failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<--8<

I am attaching the single .o file that reproduces the problem for me. Here is a
command line that causes it for me:

g++-4.8 -v -fPIC -DPIC -r -nostdlib ./timehelper.o -march=native -O3 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -o out.so


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 20:45 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:47 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-23 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #1 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> 2013-01-23 20:45:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 29259
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29259
output log


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:45 ` [Bug c++/56088] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 20:47 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:49 ` [Bug lto/56088] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-23 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #2 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> 2013-01-23 20:47:01 UTC ---
GCC information detail:

amber2::wilx:~/log4cplus-bzr/work-trunk/objdir/lto-bug> g++-4.8 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.8
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/wilx/gcc48/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../trunk/configure -v --with-pkgversion='wilx/amber2 custom
build' --enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++
--prefix=/home/wilx/gcc48 --program-suffix=-4.8 --enable-shared
--enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=rt --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-lto --enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --disable-werror
--with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
--with-gmp=/usr --with-mpc=/usr --with-mpfr=/usr --with-cloog=/usr GNAT=gnatgcc
--enable-bootstrap LD=ld.gold
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20130123 (experimental) [trunk revision 195409] (wilx/amber2
custom build) 

This was built from svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk at revision 195409.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:45 ` [Bug c++/56088] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 20:47 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 20:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-23 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-23 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-23 20:49:23 UTC ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source that was used to generate timehelper.o?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-23 20:49 ` [Bug lto/56088] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-23 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-23 20:54 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-23 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-23
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-23 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-23 20:54 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 22:20 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-23 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #4 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> 2013-01-23 20:53:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29260
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29260
preprocessed source of timehelper.cxx

Here is the preprocessed source.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-23 20:54 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 22:20 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 22:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-23 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #5 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> 2013-01-23 22:20:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you provide the preprocessed source that was used to generate timehelper.o?
Done.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-23 22:20 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 22:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-24 12:13 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-23 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |UNCONFIRMED
     Ever Confirmed|1                           |0

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-23 22:28:16 UTC ---
I cannot reproduce this because I don't have a new enough linker to test with
right now.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-23 22:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-24 12:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-28 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-24 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0
            Summary|LTO error: error: inlining  |[4.8 Regression] LTO error:
                   |failed in call to           |error: inlining failed in
                   |always_inline ‘vswprintf’:  |call to always_inline
                   |recursive inlining          |‘vswprintf’: recursive
                   |                            |inlining


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-24 12:13 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-28 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-28 20:13 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-28 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|2013-01-23 00:00:00         |2013-01-28
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-28 14:30:43 UTC ---
What linker are you using?  It seems to work for me with GNU ld 2.23.1.

Using

> ./xg++ -B. t2.ii -r -nostdlib -flto -std=c++11 -march=amdfam10 -mfxsr -fPIC -O3 -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin

and preprocessed source.  Did you use the same flags compiling timehelper.o?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-28 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-28 20:13 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2013-03-22 14:46 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-28 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

--- Comment #8 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> 2013-01-28 20:12:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What linker are you using?  It seems to work for me with GNU ld 2.23.1.
> 
> Using
> 
> > ./xg++ -B. t2.ii -r -nostdlib -flto -std=c++11 -march=amdfam10 -mfxsr -fPIC -O3 -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
> 
> and preprocessed source.  Did you use the same flags compiling timehelper.o?
I am seeing this when I add -Wl,-v to command line:

/usr/bin/ld.gold -plugin
/home/wilx/gcc48/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0/liblto_plugin.so
-plugin-opt=/home/wilx/gcc48/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
-plugin-opt=-fresolution=/tmp/cchgMTW0.res --sysroot=/ --eh-frame-hdr -m
elf_x86_64 -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -o out.so -r
-L/home/wilx/gcc48/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0
-L/home/wilx/gcc48/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0/../../../../lib64
-L/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
-L/usr/lib/../lib64 -L/home/wilx/gcc48/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8.0/../../..
-v ./timehelper.o
GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.22.90.20120924) 1.11 g++-4.8
@/tmp/cc2L4QqZ.args


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-28 20:13 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2013-03-22 14:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-16  6:25 ` yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-03-22 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.0                       |4.8.1

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-22 14:45:06 UTC ---
GCC 4.8.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-22 14:46 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-16  6:25 ` yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
  2014-02-16  6:34 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: yshuiv7 at gmail dot com @ 2014-02-16  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7 at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yshuiv7 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #11 from Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7 at gmail dot com> ---
This is still reproducible in GCC 4.8.2 on Gentoo when compiling packages like
findutils.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-16  6:25 ` yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
@ 2014-02-16  6:34 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2014-02-16  8:16 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-16  8:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2014-02-16  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |---

--- Comment #12 from Václav Zeman <vhaisman at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Yuxuan Shui from comment #11)
> This is still reproducible in GCC 4.8.2 on Gentoo when compiling packages
> like findutils.

I am reopening this then.
>From gcc-bugs-return-443685-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Feb 16 07:00:49 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-443685-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8641 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2014 07:00:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8506 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2014 07:00:44 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/52651] Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-52651-4-nLG6hpsCCk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01442.txt.bz2
Content-length: 478

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idR651
Bug 52651 depends on bug 45586, which changed state.

Bug 45586 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idE586

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-16  6:34 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
@ 2014-02-16  8:16 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-16  8:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-16  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Could be a dup of Bug 59626.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining
  2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-16  8:16 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-16  8:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-16  8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088

Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
dup. Lets close this one, because the other one has a reduced testcase.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 59626 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-16  8:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-23 20:44 [Bug c++/56088] New: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘vswprintf’: recursive inlining vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 20:45 ` [Bug c++/56088] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 20:47 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 20:49 ` [Bug lto/56088] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-23 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-23 20:54 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 22:20 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 22:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-24 12:13 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 20:13 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
2013-03-22 14:46 ` [Bug lto/56088] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16  6:25 ` yshuiv7 at gmail dot com
2014-02-16  6:34 ` vhaisman at gmail dot com
2014-02-16  8:16 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16  8:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).