public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally
@ 2013-05-14 11:39 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-21 17:52 ` [Bug libstdc++/57272] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-14 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272

            Bug ID: 57272
           Summary: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer
                    type internally
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Container nodes are linked together by built-in pointers, but they should use
the allocator's pointer type instead. Currently I think only std::vector does
this correctly.

This is quite an invasive change and not worth implementing until C++11
allocators are supported, which is only true of forward_list and unordered
containers so far.

I have a patch in progress for forward_list.   The change requires replacing
every _Node* with a _Node_ptr typedef and then using indirection through
std::pointer_traits to convert between e.g. _Node_ptr and _Node_base_ptr.
I need to do some measurement to see if the indirection has a cost and if so
then use partial specialization to avoid all the indirections when the pointer
is a built-in type.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally
  2013-05-14 11:39 [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-21 17:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-05-07 18:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-21 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-03-21
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally
  2013-05-14 11:39 [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-21 17:52 ` [Bug libstdc++/57272] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 18:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-05-07 18:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 21771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally
  2013-05-14 11:39 [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-21 17:52 ` [Bug libstdc++/57272] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-05-07 18:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 18:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>From Bug 21771: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-05/msg00294.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally
  2013-05-14 11:39 [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-05-07 18:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-19 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org            |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-19 10:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-14 11:39 [Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-21 17:52 ` [Bug libstdc++/57272] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 18:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 18:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).