public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/59479] New: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os
@ 2013-12-12 7:39 amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2013-12-13 11:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: amker.cheng at gmail dot com @ 2013-12-12 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
Bug ID: 59479
Summary: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amker.cheng at gmail dot com
Created attachment 31424
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31424&action=edit
The preprocessed file for newlib/libc/stdio/findfp.c
Hi, for attached preprocessed code from newlib/libc/stdio/findfp.c, GCC inlines
static function `std' even when optimizing for Os.
With command line:
$ ./arm-none-eabi-gcc -Os -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m0 -c -xc findfp.E -o findfp.o
The dumped symbols are like:
21: 00000009 16 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 _cleanup_r
...
29: 00000055 224 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __sinit
...
41: 000001d5 24 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __fp_unlock_all
With command line:
$ ./arm-none-eabi-gcc -Os -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m0 -c -xc findfp.E -o findfp.o
-fno-inline
The dumped symbols are like:
9: 00000018 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT 1 $t
10: 00000019 72 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 1 std.isra.0
...
24: 00000009 16 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 _cleanup_r
...
36: 0000009d 80 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __sinit
This occurs on trunk and 4_8 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59479] Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os
2013-12-12 7:39 [Bug tree-optimization/59479] New: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os amker.cheng at gmail dot com
@ 2013-12-13 11:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-13 11:15 ` amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2021-07-18 20:41 ` [Bug ipa/59479] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-13 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2013-12-13
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think you likely see a 2nd-order effect. Inlining a once called function
should not increase code size. But of course optimization opportunities
exposed by it may trigger optimizers that are not well tuned to honor -Os.
So, can you narrow down the issue a bit?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59479] Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os
2013-12-12 7:39 [Bug tree-optimization/59479] New: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2013-12-13 11:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-13 11:15 ` amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2021-07-18 20:41 ` [Bug ipa/59479] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: amker.cheng at gmail dot com @ 2013-12-13 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
--- Comment #2 from bin.cheng <amker.cheng at gmail dot com> ---
I will investigate it later. Just clarifying, the function is called three
times by the caller, it would increase code size usually.
BTW, could you explain a little about "2nd-order effect"? I am not familiar
with the concept. Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/59479] Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os
2013-12-12 7:39 [Bug tree-optimization/59479] New: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2013-12-13 11:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-13 11:15 ` amker.cheng at gmail dot com
@ 2021-07-18 20:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-18 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59479
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is there a misunderstanding of what called once means? Does it mean only
called from one other function rather than one time?
I see std is called three times from __sinit rather than once in that function.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-18 20:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-12 7:39 [Bug tree-optimization/59479] New: Inlining of static function bloats code size when Os amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2013-12-13 11:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-13 11:15 ` amker.cheng at gmail dot com
2021-07-18 20:41 ` [Bug ipa/59479] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).