public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/59883] New: Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations
@ 2014-01-19 19:09 hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 20:41 ` [Bug c++/59883] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-04 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-19 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
Bug ID: 59883
Summary: Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
I believe the following testcase:
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return foo();}
};
struct B {
struct A a;
};
struct A a[7];
int test(void)
{
return a[3].foo();
}
int test2(struct B *b)
{
return b->a.foo();
}
ought to get devirtualized by C++ FE based on the fact that the object is
contained within an structure or array. (this is related to PR46507)
In the following testcase:
namespace {
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return 42;}
};
}
int test(void)
{
struct A a, *b=&a;
return b->foo();
}
We can now probably use ipa-devirt's type inheritance graph to work out right
away that A is a final class.
And finally:
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return foo();}
};
IMO allows devirtualization of self recursive functions
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/59883] Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations
2014-01-19 19:09 [Bug c++/59883] New: Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-29 20:41 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-04 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-29 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The self-recursion testcase is wrong, as can be seen by the following testcase:
#include <stdio.h>
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return foo()+1;}
};
struct B: public A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return 1;}
};
main()
{
struct B b;
printf("%i\n",b.A::foo());
}
Still, given that recursive virtual functions seems frequent, I wonder if we
can't
try to track such explicit calls that breaks the assumption that a virtual
function is called only for derived types that do not overwrite it and try to
optimize at least for local functions...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/59883] Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations
2014-01-19 19:09 [Bug c++/59883] New: Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 20:41 ` [Bug c++/59883] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-08-04 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-04 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=110057
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first example with arrays is PR 110057 also.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-04 21:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-19 19:09 [Bug c++/59883] New: Missed C++ front-end devirtualizations hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 20:41 ` [Bug c++/59883] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-04 21:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).