public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
@ 2014-01-22 17:14 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-22 17:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59908] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-22 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Bug ID: 59908
Summary: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address
caused by LIM
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
struct S
{
int s;
struct S *p;
};
extern void bar (void) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
extern void baz (struct S **);
void
foo (struct S *x, long c)
{
int s;
struct S *y;
if (c)
bar ();
lab:
s = x->s;
y = x;
switch (s)
{
case 0:
x = x->p;
goto lab;
case 1:
baz (&y);
}
}
when compiled with -O2 -Wall -fsanitize=address incorrectly warns about maybe
uninitialized y, with just -O2 -Wall it doesn't (both 4.8 and trunk).
I couldn't find anything wrong in the -fdump-tree-asan1-all dump though, seems
like the problematic uninitialized load is inserted by lim pass, a single store
into y in the loop is replaced by load from uninitialized var before the loop
and 4 different stores after the loop (2 before the __asan_report* noreturn
calls, one before call to baz and one before exit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-22 17:19 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-22 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-01-22
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-22 17:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59908] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-29 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-26 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-29 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is a very old duplicate somewhere. Happens with store-motion for a
simple
void foo (int n)
{
int x, i;
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
x = i;
bar (&x);
}
IIRC. Of course requires us to re-write x into SSA form later, so some more
"clever" testcase is required. LIM does:
<bb 2>:
if (n_4(D) > 0)
goto <bb 3>;
else
goto <bb 9>;
<bb 3>:
x_lsm.3_5 = x;
^^^^
load of uninitialized x
<bb 4>:
# i_11 = PHI <i_6(5), 0(3)>
x_lsm.3_1 = i_11;
i_6 = i_11 + 1;
if (n_4(D) > i_6)
goto <bb 5>;
else
goto <bb 10>;
<bb 10>:
# x_lsm.3_9 = PHI <x_lsm.3_1(4)>
x = x_lsm.3_9;
goto <bb 7>;
now go find the duplicate ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-22 17:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59908] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-26 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-26 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-26 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 60649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-26 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-26 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-26 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PR39612?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-26 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-22 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.0 has been released
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-16 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.1 |4.9.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-30 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 19:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-30 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.9.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-30 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 19:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-08 4:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 19:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-08 4:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/59908] Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-08 4:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-08 4:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 5 with r5-2621 and 4.9.2 with g:5456720833910e .
Basically The inlining of the ASAN_CHECK later on fixes the issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-08 4:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-22 17:14 [Bug tree-optimization/59908] New: Incorrect uninit warning with -fsanitize=address caused by LIM jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-22 17:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59908] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-29 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-26 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-26 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 19:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-08 4:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).