public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers
@ 2014-06-02 8:07 akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-05 23:49 ` [Bug preprocessor/61386] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2014-06-02 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
Bug ID: 61386
Summary: inaccurate location for missing headers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akim.demaille at gmail dot com
Hi,
This is cosmetic only, but the error message for missing headers provides a
location is past the error.
akim@erebus /tmp $ g++-mp-4.9 foo.cc
foo.cc:2:20: fatal error: stexcept: No such file or directory
#include <stexcept>
^
compilation terminated.
Fwiw, clang's location is more alike what I expect:
akim@erebus /tmp $ clang++-mp-3.5 foo.cc
foo.cc:2:10: fatal error: 'stexcept' file not found
#include <stexcept>
^
1 error generated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] inaccurate location for missing headers
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2014-10-05 23:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-06 7:57 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-05 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-10-05
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sure, could you provide a patch? Or at least investigate what needs to be
changed?
>From gcc-bugs-return-463338-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 05 23:57:51 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-463338-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17318 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2014 23:57:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17251 invoked by uid 48); 5 Oct 2014 23:57:37 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60916] truncated error message
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 23:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-60916-4-uAerDY9kwl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1843
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60916
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-10-05
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The error within notes is also quite confusing, it is not clear if the
additional errors are explaining the notes or are separate errors.
Clang makes this much clearer:
test.cc:19:10: error: no matching function for call to 'wrapper'
return wrapper<char, f> ();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.cc:6:5: note: candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified
argument for template parameter 'F'
int wrapper ()
^
test.cc:12:5: note: candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified
argument for template parameter 'T2'
int wrapper ()
^
GCC at least could do:
t.cc: In function ‘int docall()’:
t.cc:19:28: error: no matching function for call to ‘wrapper()’
return wrapper<char, f> ();
^
t.cc:19:28: note: candidates are:
t.cc:6:5: note: #1 'template<class T, int (* F)(const T*)> int wrapper()'
int wrapper ()
^
t.cc:6:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: could not
convert template argument ‘f’ to ‘int (*)(const char*)’
t.cc:12:5: note: #2 'template<class T1, class T2, int (* F)(const T1*, const
T2*)> int wrapper()'
int wrapper ()
^
t.cc:12:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
>From gcc-bugs-return-463339-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 00:16:35 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-463339-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 520 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2014 00:16:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 494 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2014 00:16:31 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60304] Including <atomic> disables -Wconversion-null
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc component everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-60304-4-kWam5TplwR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2
Content-length: 770
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-10-06
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|preprocessor |c++
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For some reason, it thinks that "false" comes from a system-header. Weird.
>From gcc-bugs-return-463340-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 04:10:46 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-463340-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15010 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2014 04:10:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14974 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2014 04:10:40 -0000
From: "lc at luiscoloradosistemas dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63450] Optimizing -O3 generates rep ret on an almost empty function
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 04:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: lc at luiscoloradosistemas dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63450-4-WLWRiqSHq5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2
Content-length: 386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc450
--- Comment #3 from Luis Colorado <lc at luiscoloradosistemas dot com> ---
just one thing. When you compile a completely empty function you get `rep ret'
in one line, instead of that on two lines. The result is some assemblers (gnu
as at version 2.20, for example) complainting it as an error and you don't get
a good compilation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] inaccurate location for missing headers
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-05 23:49 ` [Bug preprocessor/61386] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-06 7:57 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-06 9:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: akim.demaille at gmail dot com @ 2014-10-06 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
--- Comment #2 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> ---
Well, I never hacked in GCC. I can try, time permitting...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] inaccurate location for missing headers
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-05 23:49 ` [Bug preprocessor/61386] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-06 7:57 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
@ 2014-10-06 9:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02 2:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-06 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 5788 bytes --]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Akim Demaille from comment #2)
> Well, I never hacked in GCC. I can try, time permitting...
Never too late to try. This one should be easy if you know how to use a
debugger. Just add a breakpoint in c_cpp_error, then go up in the backtrace
until you find a place where the correct location is known (in libcpp,
location_t is called source_location but they are the same thing), pass that
location to c_cpp_error.
You can use expand_location(location) to see what locations point to.
No hurries. You have all the time in the world :)
>From gcc-bugs-return-463351-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 10:11:05 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-463351-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31863 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2014 10:11:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31794 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2014 10:11:01 -0000
From: "peron.clem at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: peron.clem at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-54303-4-Vfn4l4rmXj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2
Content-length: 981
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Clément Péron <peron.clem at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |peron.clem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from Clément Péron <peron.clem at gmail dot com> ---
The Bugs is still present in GCC 4.6.4 and 4.8.2.
.strX.X try to optimize string constants but when you disable it the var are
moved into .rodata instead of .rodata.__function when the -fdata-sections is
enabled.
I post a question on StackOverflow :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26100976/var-declare-inside-a-printf-cant-be-garbage-collected-by-gcc?answertab=oldest#tab-top
And i sent a message on GCC-Help mailing list :
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-10/msg00000.html
It's really annoying when you try to optimize the size of the executable.
Thanks
>From gcc-bugs-return-463352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 06 11:17:38 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-463352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14853 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2014 11:17:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14543 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2014 11:17:34 -0000
From: "jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63347] m68k misoptimisation with -fschedule-insns
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63347-4-0DwFpYtiTQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63347-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63347-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2
Content-length: 513
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc347
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Larmour <jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org> ---
I have just double-checked, and my gcc 4.8.3 definitely doesn't generate the
'tstl', but it looks like you're bang on right about how gcc was configured: I
configured it with --with-archÏ. Sorry I should have realised the importance
of this before and included it!
So I think you should be able to reproduce it if you add -mcpuR06 (or any
other coldfire cpu) to the compile line.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] inaccurate location for missing headers
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-06 9:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-02 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02 2:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-02 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |7.1.0
Known to fail| |4.9.0
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 7 produces:
<source>:1:11: fatal error: stexcept: No such file or directory
#include <stexcept>
^~~~~~~~~~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/61386] inaccurate location for missing headers
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-02 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-02 2:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-02 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by r7-1651.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-02 2:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-02 8:07 [Bug preprocessor/61386] New: inaccurate location for missing headers akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-05 23:49 ` [Bug preprocessor/61386] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-06 7:57 ` akim.demaille at gmail dot com
2014-10-06 9:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02 2:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02 2:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).