public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jvb at cyberscience dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:37:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61577-4-5TRWFd1o44@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #219 from John Buddery <jvb at cyberscience dot com> ---
Great, thanks - I'll look at ia64.c and build and test with that change.
Yes, "b" on ia64 seems to be a branch register, and the brl op only accepts
immediate values not registers. Initially I hoped the assembler would patch
this up and accept both, but it doesn't so the two variants are needed.
I'll look into the scall attribute as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-06-21 11:01 ` [Bug c++/61577] [4.9.0] " FBergemann at web dot de
2015-10-15 11:04 ` [Bug target/61577] " josephpattara at gmail dot com
2015-10-19 11:34 ` josephpattara at gmail dot com
2019-07-05 1:51 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-02-25 14:55 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] " peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-04-18 1:11 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-04-23 15:48 ` peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-04-23 16:50 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-05-02 4:14 ` peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-05-02 14:30 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-05-13 18:03 ` jared.martinsen at fiserv dot com
2020-05-13 19:04 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-04-16 21:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-24 22:21 ` peter at int19h dot net
2021-05-17 9:56 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-19 16:23 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 9:19 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-20 13:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 13:37 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com [this message]
2021-05-20 14:02 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 14:59 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-20 15:03 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 15:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 17:00 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 17:22 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-06-03 17:19 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-06-09 9:51 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-06-09 10:12 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-04 21:56 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-05 8:56 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 2:51 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-14 8:35 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 15:43 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 16:10 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-14 16:13 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 16:37 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 12:09 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 14:22 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-15 14:39 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 14:58 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-15 15:01 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 15:24 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-15 18:48 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 11:33 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-16 12:48 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 12:51 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 13:27 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-16 13:29 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-17 17:14 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-17 17:39 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-17 18:38 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-18 2:02 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-18 12:39 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-19 21:00 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-19 22:43 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:06 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:07 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:08 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 17:04 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-20 17:05 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 17:58 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 18:24 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 23:58 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 0:01 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 2:32 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21 2:38 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 2:59 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21 4:36 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21 5:13 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 6:32 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 15:15 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-21 16:19 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 16:43 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-21 16:55 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 17:26 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-27 22:09 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-11-16 13:01 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-61577-4-5TRWFd1o44@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).