public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:25:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61577-4-qt8VXjtGsv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577

--- Comment #218 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 5:19 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #217 from John Buddery <jvb at cyberscience dot com> ---
> Thanks very much for adding the binutils patch.
>
> Sorry, I'm new to .md definitions, so I've probably got this wrong. Did you
> mean something like:
>
> (define_insn "call_nogp_longcall"
>   [(call (mem:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "call_operand" "?b,s"))
>          (const_int 0))
>    (clobber (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "=b,b"))]
>   "TARGET_HPUX && ia64_tune == PROCESSOR_ITANIUM2"
>   "@
>    br.call%+.many %1 = %0
>    brl.call%+.many %1 = %0"
>   [(set_attr "itanium_class" "br,scall")])
>
> (define_insn "call_nogp"
>   [(call (mem:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "call_operand" "?b,s"))
>          (const_int 0))
>    (clobber (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "=b,b"))]
>   ""
>   "br.call%+.many %1 = %0"
>   [(set_attr "itanium_class" "br,scall")])
>
> I assume you need a second instruction to catch the case where the condition
> doesn't match ?
Yes.  Note that the call_nogp pattern is output directly in a couple of places
in ia64.c.  These
will need adjustment for hpux.

I'm not a ia64 maintainer.  I can only apply changes specific to hpux.

I have limited knowledge of the ia64 instruction set.  In the above, the
"brl.call" alternative
apples to the "s" constraint for operand 0.  Is that what you want?  The
"br.call" form is used
for the disparaged "b" constraint for operand 0.

I'm not sure that the scall call attribute is correct for brl.
>
> Itanium 1 support seems to have been dropped at some point, so -mtune only
> accepts options mapping to Itanium2. So, I couldn't test the br case on HP.
Then, we don't need to check the ia64_tune in the above.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-06-21 11:01 ` [Bug c++/61577] [4.9.0] " FBergemann at web dot de
2015-10-15 11:04 ` [Bug target/61577] " josephpattara at gmail dot com
2015-10-19 11:34 ` josephpattara at gmail dot com
2019-07-05  1:51 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-02-25 14:55 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] " peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-04-18  1:11 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-04-23 15:48 ` peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-04-23 16:50 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-05-02  4:14 ` peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com
2020-05-02 14:30 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2020-05-13 18:03 ` jared.martinsen at fiserv dot com
2020-05-13 19:04 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-04-16 21:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-24 22:21 ` peter at int19h dot net
2021-05-17  9:56 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-19 16:23 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20  9:19 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-20 13:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net [this message]
2021-05-20 13:37 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-20 14:02 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 14:59 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-05-20 15:03 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 15:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 17:00 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-05-20 17:22 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-06-03 17:19 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-06-09  9:51 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-06-09 10:12 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-04 21:56 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-05  8:56 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14  2:51 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-14  8:35 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 15:43 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 16:10 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-14 16:13 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-14 16:37 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 12:09 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 14:22 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-15 14:39 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 14:58 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-15 15:01 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-15 15:24 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-15 18:48 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 11:33 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-16 12:48 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 12:51 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-16 13:27 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-16 13:29 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-17 17:14 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-17 17:39 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-17 18:38 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-18  2:02 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-18 12:39 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-19 21:00 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-19 22:43 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:06 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:07 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 16:08 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 17:04 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-20 17:05 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 17:58 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 18:24 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-20 23:58 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21  0:01 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21  2:32 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21  2:38 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21  2:59 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21  4:36 ` bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
2021-07-21  5:13 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21  6:32 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 15:15 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-21 16:19 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 16:43 ` jvb at cyberscience dot com
2021-07-21 16:55 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-07-21 17:26 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2021-07-27 22:09 ` me at larbob dot org
2021-11-16 13:01 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:35 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug middle-end/61577] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61577-4-qt8VXjtGsv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).