public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/62200] New: libstdc++ initialization priority
@ 2014-08-20 10:02 vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2014-08-20 10:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/62200] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
  2023-02-03 19:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vhaisman at gmail dot com @ 2014-08-20 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62200

            Bug ID: 62200
           Summary: libstdc++ initialization priority
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vhaisman at gmail dot com

I am trying to initialize my library early using the `init_priority` attribute.
Some paths of my library's initialization might try to print warnings and/or
errors. I have hit a SIGSEGV with the following test case, which uses
std::cerr. According to some, the library should initialize with priority 101.
If this were the case I would expect the test case to work flawlessly.

~~~~
#include <iostream>

struct S1
{
    S1() { std::cerr << __FUNCTION__ << "\n"; }
} static s1 __attribute__ ((__init_priority__ (65535/2)));


int
main ()
{
  return 0;
}
~~~~

The stack trace is

~~~~
#0  0x00007ffff7b6a559 in std::ostream::sentry::sentry(std::ostream&) ()
from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x00007ffff7b6ac19 in std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&
std::__ostream_insert<char, std::char_traits<char> >(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*, long)
    () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#2  0x00007ffff7b6b077 in std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&
std::operator<< <std::char_traits<char> >(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#3  0x000000000040081d in S1::S1 (this=0x601172 <s1>) at test.cxx:5
#4  0x00000000004007d6 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0
(__initialize_p=1, __priority=32767) at test.cxx:6
#5  0x00000000004007eb in _GLOBAL__sub_I.32767_main(void) () at test.cxx:13
#6  0x000000000040087d in __libc_csu_init ()
#7  0x00007ffff7731e55 in __libc_start_main (main=0x40077d <main()>, argc=1,
argv=0x7fffffffe2c8, init=0x400830 <__libc_csu_init>, fini=<optimized out>,
rtld_fini=<optimized out>,
    stack_end=0x7fffffffe2b8) at libc-start.c:246
#8  0x00000000004006b9 in _start ()
~~~~


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-03 19:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-20 10:02 [Bug libstdc++/62200] New: libstdc++ initialization priority vhaisman at gmail dot com
2014-08-20 10:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/62200] " vhaisman at gmail dot com
2023-02-03 19:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).