public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-09-01 21:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-09-01 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++ |preprocessor
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is correct tokenization has to happen in #if code.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 11806 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-01 21:35 ` [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-27 11:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 20:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-27 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |david.post at ohyonghao dot com
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 101628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-01 21:35 ` [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-15 20:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 12:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 12:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-15 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=11064
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Similar issue as PR 11064.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-15 20:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-08 12:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 12:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-08 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What's really fun is that you can't even do:
#if __cpp_digit_separators
int i = 1'000;
#else
int i = 1000;
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-08 12:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-08 12:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-08 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think it is PR14634 that actually changed this.
The question is if we can avoid the pedwarn in system headers, or if it should
be kind of pedwarn that isn't emitted as a warning without
-pedantic/-Wpedantic.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-08 12:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-09-01 21:35 ` [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-15 20:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 12:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 12:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).