public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug jit/64196] New: No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code
@ 2014-12-05 15:45 dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-02-10  6:53 ` [Bug jit/64196] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-15 13:49 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-05 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

            Bug ID: 64196
           Summary: No automated test coverage for debugging of
                    JIT-generated code
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: jit
          Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

gcc/jit/docs/intro/tutorial04.rst shows an example of debugging,
single-stepping through JIT-generated code in gdb [1].

This was all tested by hand.  We don't yet have any automated test coverage to
verify that this works.

[1]: built HTML version of this currently here:
https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/intro/tutorial04.html#single-stepping-through-the-generated-code


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code
  2014-12-05 15:45 [Bug jit/64196] New: No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-10  6:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-15 13:49 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-02-10
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code
  2014-12-05 15:45 [Bug jit/64196] New: No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-02-10  6:53 ` [Bug jit/64196] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-15 13:49 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-15 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is partially implemented by commit
g:332a9f7636ca2a49be3a6ee9c610c5dba9e7e2da.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-15 13:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-05 15:45 [Bug jit/64196] New: No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10  6:53 ` [Bug jit/64196] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-15 13:49 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).