[Bug fortran/64207] New: vectorization report

[Bug fortran/64207] New: vectorization report

[mike at mikepage dot us]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207

            Bug ID: 64207
           Summary: vectorization report
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: mike at mikepage dot us

gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (MacPorts gcc49 4.9.2_1) 4.9.2


gfortran -O3 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=6 foo.f90

is not issuing vectorization report

cat foo.f90

program main
  real, dimension(1024, 1024) :: a,b,c
  call random_number(a)
  call random_number(b)
  do i=1,1024    
    do j=1,1024
      c(i,j) = a(j,i)*b(j,i)
    end do
  end do
  print *,c
end program main

[Bug fortran/64207] vectorization report

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207

Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
                   |                            |.ch
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
-fopt-info is the replacement for -ftree-vectorizer-verbose, the latter is
deprecated

for example try -fopt-info-vec-missed or -fopt-info-all

best is to keep the part to analyze rather simple, since it generates a lot of
info that isn't always easy to understand:

> cat t.f90
subroutine s(a,b,c) 
  real, dimension(1024, 1024) :: a,b,c
  do i=1,1024    
    do j=1,1024
      c(i,j) = a(j,i)*b(j,i)
    end do
  end do
end subroutine

> gfortran -c -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -fopt-info-vec-missed t.f90
t.f90:3:0: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
t.f90:3:0: note: bad data access.
t.f90:4:0: note: not consecutive access *c_19(D)[_10] = _18;

t.f90:4:0: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
t.f90:4:0: note: bad data access.
[...]

> cat t.f90
subroutine s(a,b,c) 
  real, dimension(1024, 1024) :: a,b,c
  do i=1,1024    
    do j=1,1024
      c(j,i) = a(j,i)*b(j,i)
    end do
  end do
end subroutine

> gfortran -c -O3 -march=native -ffast-math  -fopt-info-vec  t.f90
t.f90:4:0: note: loop vectorized
t.f90:4:0: note: loop peeled for vectorization to enhance alignment

[Bug fortran/64207] vectorization report

[mike at mikepage dot us]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207

--- Comment #2 from Mike Page <mike at mikepage dot us> ---
Thanks, Joost.

I need to go find some current documentation.

Thanks for fixing the typo in my bad example.

[Bug fortran/64207] vectorization report

[mike at mikepage dot us]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207

--- Comment #3 from Mike Page <mike at mikepage dot us> ---
BTW, I was using 
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html#using
for my info on optimization options.

[Bug fortran/64207] vectorization report

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207

--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Mike Page from comment #3)
> BTW, I was using 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html#using
> for my info on optimization options.

yes, I agree that there is lots of outdated info, also I had to search a while
to find the proper option name. Almost all hits online refer to the old option.
The web never forgets ;-)