public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
@ 2015-01-20 1:30 rs2740 at gmail dot com
2022-04-29 19:06 ` [Bug c++/64679] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rs2740 at gmail dot com @ 2015-01-20 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679
Bug ID: 64679
Summary: Spurious redefinition error when parsing
not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rs2740 at gmail dot com
Repro:
class Bar{
public:
Bar(int, int, int);
};
int main () {
int x = 1;
Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x});
}
gcc HEAD 5.0.0 20150119 (experimental) with g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra
-std=gnu++1y reports:
prog.cc: In function 'int main()':
prog.cc:8:24: error: redefinition of 'int x'
Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x});
^
prog.cc:8:16: note: 'int x' previously declared here
Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x});
With the last int{x} (note the braces) this cannot be a function declaration,
but g++ appears to emit the redefinition errors too early, before the full
declaration is parsed. Clang compiles this successfully.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64679] Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
2015-01-20 1:30 [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations rs2740 at gmail dot com
@ 2022-04-29 19:06 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-04 20:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-29 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64679] Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
2015-01-20 1:30 [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations rs2740 at gmail dot com
2022-04-29 19:06 ` [Bug c++/64679] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-04 20:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-05 21:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-05 21:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-04 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467
commit r13-121-ga733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:01:12 2022 -0400
c++: wrong parse with functors [PR64679]
Consider
struct F {
F(int) {}
F operator()(int) const { return *this; }
};
and
F(i)(0)(0);
where we're supposed to first call the constructor and then invoke
the operator() twice. However, we parse this as an init-declarator:
"(i)" looks like a perfectly valid declarator, then we see an '(' and
think it must be an initializer, so we commit and we're toast. My
fix is to look a little bit farther before deciding we've seen an
initializer.
This is only a half of c++/64679, the other part of the PR is unrelated:
there the problem is that we are calling pushdecl while parsing
tentatively (in cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list), which is bad.
PR c++/64679
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_init_declarator): Properly handle a series
of
operator() calls, they are not part of an init-declarator.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/parse/functor1.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64679] Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
2015-01-20 1:30 [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations rs2740 at gmail dot com
2022-04-29 19:06 ` [Bug c++/64679] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-04 20:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-05 21:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-05 21:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-05 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee9128189623ce43343ce326caa8d5eec2eccfec
commit r13-146-gee9128189623ce43343ce326caa8d5eec2eccfec
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date: Tue May 3 19:01:19 2022 -0400
c++: wrong error with MVP and pushdecl [PR64679]
This patch fixes the second half of 64679. Here we issue a wrong
"redefinition of 'int x'" for the following:
struct Bar {
Bar(int, int, int);
};
int x = 1;
Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x}); // #1
cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list does pushdecl every time it sees
a named parameter, so the second "int(x)" causes the error. That's
premature, since this turns out to be a constructor call after the
third argument!
If the first parameter is parenthesized, we can't push until we've
established we're looking at a function declaration. Therefore this
could be fixed by some kind of lookahead. I thought about introducing a
lightweight variant of cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list that would
not have any side effects and would return as soon as it figures out
whether it's looking at a declaration or expression. Since that would
require fairly nontrivial changes, I wanted something simpler.
Something like delaying the pushdecl until we've reached the ')'
following the parameter-declaration-clause. But we must push the
parameters before processing a default argument, as in:
Bar bar(int(a), int(b), int c = sizeof(a)); // valid
Moreover, this code should still be accepted
Bar f(int(i), decltype(i) j = 42);
so this patch stashes parameters into a vector when parsing tentatively
only when pushdecl-ing a parameter would result in a clash and an error
about redefinition/redeclaration. The stashed parameters are pushed at
the end of a parameter-declaration-clause if it's followed by a ')', so
that we still diagnose redefining a parameter.
PR c++/64679
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause): Maintain
a vector of parameters that haven't been pushed yet. Push them at
the
end of a valid parameter-declaration-clause.
(cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list): Take a new auto_vec
parameter.
Do not pushdecl while parsing tentatively when pushdecl-ing a
parameter
would result in a hard error.
(cp_parser_cache_defarg): Adjust the call to
cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C: New test.
* g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C: New test.
* g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C: New test.
* g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64679] Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations
2015-01-20 1:30 [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations rs2740 at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-05 21:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-05 21:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-05 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 13.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-05 21:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-20 1:30 [Bug c++/64679] New: Spurious redefinition error when parsing not-quite-most-vexing-parse declarations rs2740 at gmail dot com
2022-04-29 19:06 ` [Bug c++/64679] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-04 20:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-05 21:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-05 21:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).