public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
@ 2015-01-20 17:08 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-01-20 17:44 ` [Bug libstdc++/64695] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-01-20 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

            Bug ID: 64695
           Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com

On Linux/x86, r219789 gave

FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc print t2
FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc print rtpl
FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc print tpl

r219784 is OK.  The error message looks like:

Python Exception <type 'exceptions.ValueError'> Cannot parse more than 2 nodes
in a tuple tree.: ^M
...}^M
got: $23 = std::tuple containing = {[1] = 6Python Exception <type
'exceptions.ValueError'> Cannot parse more than 2 nodes in a tuple tree.: ^M
FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc print tpl
skipping: ...}^M
$24 = std::tuple containing = {[1] = 6Python Exception <type
'exceptions.ValueError'> Cannot parse more than 2 nodes in a tuple tree.: ^M
...}^M
A debugging session is active.^M
^M
        Inferior 1 [process 22576] will be killed.^M
^M
Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]^M
got: $24 = std::tuple containing = {[1] = 6Python Exception <type
'exceptions.ValueError'> Cannot parse more than 2 nodes in a tuple tree.: ^M


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-01-20 17:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-20 17:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-20 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-01-20
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-01-20 17:44 ` [Bug libstdc++/64695] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-20 17:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-21 19:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-20 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I had these failures on aarch64 also.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-01-20 17:44 ` [Bug libstdc++/64695] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-20 17:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-21 19:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-02-04 19:02 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-01-21 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed by r219953.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-01-21 19:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-02-04 19:02 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-02-04 19:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-02-04 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 64929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-04 19:02 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-02-04 19:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2015-02-20 14:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-02-20 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2015-02-04 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
It is caused by r219785 which changed std::tuple implementation and requires
updating class StdTuplePrinter in python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-04 19:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2015-02-20 14:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-02-20 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-20 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 20 14:40:00 2015
New Revision: 220871

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR libstdc++/64695
    * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdTuplePrinter): Handle new
    tuple layout.

Modified:
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
  2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-20 14:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-20 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-20 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

There are still some odd printer FAILs on ppc64 but they're unrelated:

FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab
Python Exception <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Cannot locate object file for
block.: ^M
skipping: Python Exception <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Cannot locate
object file for block.: ^M
Python Exception <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Cannot locate object file for
block.: ^M
skipping: Python Exception <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Cannot locate
object file for block.: ^M


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-20 14:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-20 17:08 [Bug libstdc++/64695] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-01-20 17:44 ` [Bug libstdc++/64695] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-20 17:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-21 19:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-02-04 19:02 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-02-04 19:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-02-20 14:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 14:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).