public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/65214] New: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks
@ 2015-02-25 22:27 olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-28  5:09 ` [Bug target/65214] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-25 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65214

            Bug ID: 65214
           Summary: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
            Target: sh*-*-*

This is an example from gcc.c-torture/execute/pr20187-1.c:

int a = 0x101;
int b = 0x100;

int
test (void)
{
  return (((unsigned char) (unsigned long long) ((a ? a : 1) & (a * b)))
      ? 0 : 1);
}

compiled with -m4 -ml -O2 -fdisable-rtl-dbr:

        mov.l   .L6,r1
        mov.l   @r1,r2
        mov     #1,r1     // r1 is zero extended after constant load
        tst     r2,r2
        bt      .L2
        exts.b  r2,r1
.L2:
        mov.l   .L7,r3
        extu.b  r1,r1     // r1 = extu.b (exts.b (r2))
        mov.l   @r3,r3
        mulu.w  r2,r3
        sts     macl,r3
        tst     r3,r1
        movt    r0
        rts
        nop

The extu.b basically overrides result of exts.b.  Thus we can replace the
exts.b with extu.b and eliminate one insn:

        mov.l   .L6,r1
        mov.l   @r1,r2
        mov     #1,r1
        tst     r2,r2
        bt      .L2
        extu.b  r2,r1
.L2:
        mov.l   .L7,r3
        mov.l   @r3,r3
        mulu.w  r2,r3
        sts     macl,r3
        tst     r3,r1
        movt    r0
        rts
        nop


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65214] [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks
  2015-02-25 22:27 [Bug target/65214] New: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-28  5:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-28  5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65214

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-28  5:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-25 22:27 [Bug target/65214] New: [SH] Optimize sign/zero extensions across basic blocks olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28  5:09 ` [Bug target/65214] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).