public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
  2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-02 15:50 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 20:49 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-02 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-10-02
   Target Milestone|---                         |6.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
@ 2015-10-02 15:50 mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 15:50 ` [Bug c/67819] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-02 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

            Bug ID: 67819
           Summary: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

I.e. don't warn for:

#define FOO 4
#define BAR 4

int
fn (int n)
{
  if (n <= FOO)
    return 1;
  else if (n <= BAR)
    return 2;
  return 0;
}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
  2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 15:50 ` [Bug c/67819] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-02 20:49 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 21:15 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-02 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry if this has been discussed before, but can't you use
linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p to check whether the conditional
contains a macro expansion, and to inhibit the warning if so?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
  2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 15:50 ` [Bug c/67819] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-02 20:49 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-02 21:15 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-05  9:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-15  4:17 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-02 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Sorry if this has been discussed before, but can't you use
> linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p to check whether the conditional
> contains a macro expansion, and to inhibit the warning if so?

Answered my own question: no, because e.g. integer constants expanded from
macros don't have locations, from this thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01599.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
  2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-10-02 21:15 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-05  9:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-01-15  4:17 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-05  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, exactly; this problem will require some significant effort, I'm afraid
>:(.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account
  2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-10-05  9:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15  4:17 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15  4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This blocks the enablement of -Wduplicated-cond with -Wall/-Wextra; see bug
87656

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-15  4:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-02 15:50 [Bug c/67819] New: -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-02 15:50 ` [Bug c/67819] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-02 20:49 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-02 21:15 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-05  9:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15  4:17 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).