public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/70392] [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised warnings for if clause
       [not found] <bug-70392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-04-15 16:30 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-13  8:01 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-15 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2017-12-30 00:00:00         |2021-4-15
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=81714
      Known to fail|                            |10.2.0, 11.0, 6.3.0, 7.0.1,
                   |                            |8.3.0, 9.3.0
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed with GCC 11.

The cases in I. comment #0 are also the subject of pr81714 so let's use this to
track just the openacc subset.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/70392] [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised warnings for if clause
       [not found] <bug-70392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-04-15 16:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/70392] [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised warnings for if clause msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-13  8:01 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-13  8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Jakub resolved this in commit d0befed793b94f3f407be44e6f69f81a02f5f073 "openmp:
Add support for OpenMP 5.1 masked construct" via the
'gcc/gimplify.c:gimplify_scan_omp_clauses' change specifically, plus
corresponding 'goacc' testsuite updates.  Thanks!, but I do wonder, though, why
such a general change isn't put into its own commit...

Not worth backporting, in my opinion.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-13  8:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-70392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-15 16:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/70392] [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised warnings for if clause msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-13  8:01 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).