* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-12 11:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 12:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 12:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-01 8:07 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 12:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-01 8:07 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-01 8:15 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-01 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
@marxin: does your porting of GCC documentation to sphinx address this issue at
all?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-01 8:07 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-01 8:15 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 17:56 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
2023-10-10 20:29 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-01 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15)
> @marxin: does your porting of GCC documentation to sphinx address this issue
> at all?
If I see correctly, it's not addressed. The C++ options are listed at the
following 2 pages:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/html/gcc/gcc-command-options/options-controlling-c%2B%2B-dialect.html
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/html/gcc/gcc-command-options/options-to-request-or-suppress-warnings.html
What's new that I generated entry for e.g.:
-Wno-format
Default option value for -Wformat.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-01 8:15 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-04 17:56 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
2023-10-10 20:29 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: barry.revzin at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-04 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> That is because this is C++ only option. It is listed under
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.1.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.
> html#C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options :
>
> -Wno-terminate (C++ and Objective-C++ only)
> Disable the warning about a throw-expression that will immediately result in
> a call to terminate.
>
> This is exact location for all other C++ only options are located.
>
> So not a bug.
Sure, but right now some warnings are under Warning Options and others are
under Dialect Options. I would never think to look for warnings under dialect
options, since my initial thought would be that the latter is for the kinds of
things that show up first on that page... -fabi-version, -fchar8_t, etc. You
have to go pretty far down that page to get to warnings. -Wsuggest-override
used to be under Warning Options, was recently moved to Dialect Options for
instance.
I would like to request that either all the warning options are documented
under warning options, or that there is one page for all the C++ warning
options (as distinct from "dialect options"), or something else along those
lines. The current split is a bit confusing and makes it hard to find warnings.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual
[not found] <bug-71283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-04 17:56 ` barry.revzin at gmail dot com
@ 2023-10-10 20:29 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-10 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Florian Weimer was wondering about this general issue (of inconsistency in
location of documentation for common C/C++ options) on the mailing lists
recently: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-October/242669.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread