public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table
       [not found] <bug-71760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2024-04-11  1:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-11  3:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-11  3:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-11  1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71760

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.0

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in GCC 9 by r9-6544-g62de703f1990d2 .

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-March/518751.html .

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table
       [not found] <bug-71760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2024-04-11  1:29 ` [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-11  3:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-11  3:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-11  3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71760

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Fixed in GCC 9 by r9-6544-g62de703f1990d2 .
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-March/518751.html .

Wonder if it's worth adding the testcase?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table
       [not found] <bug-71760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2024-04-11  1:29 ` [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-04-11  3:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-11  3:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-11  3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71760

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Fixed in GCC 9 by r9-6544-g62de703f1990d2 .
> > 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-March/518751.html .
> 
> Wonder if it's worth adding the testcase?

It included one.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-11  3:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-71760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2024-04-11  1:29 ` [Bug other/71760] libiberty - Segmentation fault when attempting to delete a non-existent element in a hash table pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-11  3:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-11  3:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).