public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong
[not found] <bug-80677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-11-05 12:53 ` helmut at subdivi dot de
2022-12-01 16:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 16:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: helmut at subdivi dot de @ 2022-11-05 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677
Helmut Grohne <helmut at subdivi dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |helmut at subdivi dot de
--- Comment #3 from Helmut Grohne <helmut at subdivi dot de> ---
Created attachment 53832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53832&action=edit
eliminate the need for LIMITS_H_TEST entirely
Rather than fix LIMITS_H_TEST, I now propose deleting it. The check that we try
to perform at build time with wrong paths can be deferred to runtime and then
operated with correct paths. I'm using this patch since at least gcc-11 and
only encountered one regression thus far. It triggers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755 on hurd, but this is a plain
gcc bug that needs fixing anyway, so this should be good to go.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong
[not found] <bug-80677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-11-05 12:53 ` [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong helmut at subdivi dot de
@ 2022-12-01 16:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 16:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-01 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2014-January/211652.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong
[not found] <bug-80677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-11-05 12:53 ` [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong helmut at subdivi dot de
2022-12-01 16:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-01 16:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-01 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80677
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-April/472727.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-01 16:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-80677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-11-05 12:53 ` [Bug bootstrap/80677] LIMITS_H_TEST is wrong helmut at subdivi dot de
2022-12-01 16:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 16:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).