public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/81674] gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors
       [not found] <bug-81674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-04-02 16:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-19 16:21 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-02 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81674

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=78391
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|2018-02-02 00:00:00         |2021-4-2

--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed with GCC 11.  See also pr78391.  The patch in pr19808 comment 29
was either never committed or even submitted, and the other patch for the same
bug submitted last November
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559162.html) wasn't
approved.  Let me CC Marek to see if plans to resubmit it for GCC 12.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/81674] gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors
       [not found] <bug-81674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-04-02 16:57 ` [Bug c++/81674] gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-19 16:21 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-19 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81674

--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> Reconfirmed with GCC 11.  See also pr78391.  The patch in pr19808 comment 29
> was either never committed or even submitted, and the other patch for the
> same bug submitted last November
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559162.html) wasn't
> approved.  Let me CC Marek to see if plans to resubmit it for GCC 12.

the patch for pr19808 has been committed now

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-19 16:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-81674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-02 16:57 ` [Bug c++/81674] gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-19 16:21 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).