public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/84779] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-05-14  9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-01  8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|8.5                         |9.4

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/84779] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-05-14  9:50 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01  8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-27  9:38 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01  8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|9.4                         |9.5

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-05-14  9:50 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-01  8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27  9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|9.5                         |10.4

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-27  9:38 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-30 19:10 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|10.4                        |10.5

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-03-30 19:10 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-03-30 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|anlauf at gmx dot de               |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've come back to this PR again and spent a while trying to further narrow
things down and to find the gcc options that make the code compile or fail.

Minimal reproducer:

        complex function f2 (a)
        implicit none
        integer   a
        logical   e2
        entry e2 (a)
        if (a > 0) then
          e2 = .true.
        else
          f2 = 45
        endif
        end

Basic command line: "gfortran -fdefault-integer-8", plus:

these all lead to an ICE:
! -O1
! -O1 -fno-tree-pre
! -O2 -fno-tree-pre

but no ICE with:
! -O2
! -O1 -ftree-pre
! -O2 -ftree-pre
! -O1 -fno-tree-sra
! -O2 -fno-tree-sra
! -O1 -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-pre
! -O2 -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-pre

So is this now a frontend bug - what could it be? - or a middle-end issue?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/84779] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE
       [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-03-30 19:10 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84779

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|10.5                        |11.5

--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-84779-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14  9:50 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Compiling gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 with -O1 or -Os and -fdefault-integer-8 gives an ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:38 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 19:10 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug fortran/84779] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).