public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/85640] [8/9/10/11 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-02-03 18:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 18:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-03 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bisection on size shows
r8-1162-gba00284cedbcb0b980af4e5e41f427581af64462
as the first size difference, then
r9-2350-gf80d6a178ed2043c6a9a4d8076cdc72d61b67b2b
for a smaller growth,
r11-3874-gec5e6467091ee0f8de2f894f0c1669465a8440f1
was apparently a temporary growth only,
r11-4569-g33c0f246f799b7403171e97f31276a8feddd05c9
grew the other Adler32 function.
Anyway, the first one seems to be the largest size difference.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [8/9/10/11 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-03 18:09 ` [Bug target/85640] [8/9/10/11 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-03 18:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:50 ` [Bug target/85640] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-03 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Anyway, the problem discussed in #c2 to #c4 doesn't seem to exist in 10/trunk
anymore, since:
r10-2806-gdf7d46d925c7baca7bf9961aee900876d8aef225
And at least some of the changes that grew size are desirable for speed (and
-O3 is not size optimization), so is there anything we want to do about this
PR?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [9/10/11/12 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-03 18:09 ` [Bug target/85640] [8/9/10/11 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 18:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [9/10/11/12 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:50 ` [Bug target/85640] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:39 ` [Bug target/85640] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [10/11/12/13 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [10/11/12/13 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:39 ` [Bug target/85640] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug target/85640] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [11/12/13/14 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/85640] [11/12/13/14 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug target/85640] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 21:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85640
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems like it has been improved again for GCC 12.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-22 21:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-85640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-03 18:09 ` [Bug target/85640] [8/9/10/11 Regression] code size regression vs 7.x jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 18:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:50 ` [Bug target/85640] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:39 ` [Bug target/85640] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:33 ` [Bug target/85640] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 21:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).