public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-02-10 21:20 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-10 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should this be resolved as fixed per comment #10?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2021-02-15 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I believe it's still an issue for gcc-8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-04 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The GCC 8 branch is being closed, fixed in GCC 9.1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-14 10:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-86010-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-10 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 16:47 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).