public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0)
       [not found] <bug-86096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-02-16 17:04 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-02-16 17:36 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-14 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-16 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096

seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried this on power LE and BE machines with gcc 9, 10, and trunk (11) and was
unable to duplicate.  It looks from above like it was fixed.  Should it be
closed?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0)
       [not found] <bug-86096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-02-16 17:04 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0) seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-16 17:36 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-14 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-16 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096

--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It was fixed on the trunk only, so as the title says it remains an issue on the
gcc-8 branch (which is still open). Bugzilla doesn't have separate resolutions
for different branches, we cannot have this "RESOLVED" on the gcc-9/10/trunk
and "WONTFIX" on gcc-8 branch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0)
       [not found] <bug-86096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-02-16 17:04 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0) seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-02-16 17:36 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|8.5                         |9.0

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The GCC 8 branch is being closed, fixed in GCC 9.1.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-14 10:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-86096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-02-16 17:04 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/86096] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0) seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16 17:36 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).