public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK
[not found] <bug-87243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2019-10-13 19:35 ` howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
2021-11-30 8:09 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 8:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com @ 2019-10-13 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth <howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
Why can't maybe_get_sysroot_from_sdkroot() be expanded so that it attempts to
execute 'xcrun --show-sdk-path' to obtain SDKROOT when unset? IMHO, this would
mitigate the overhead for the compiler as xrcun would only be called when
absolutely needed. The overall overhead in that case shouldn't be much worst
than Apple's compiler wrapper approach to calling their compiler through xcrun
itself.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 19:58:19 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30498 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 19:58:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30461 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 19:58:11 -0000
From: "mail at milianw dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/91929] missing inline subroutine information in build using sin/cos
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mail at milianw dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-91929-4-ORKkKs5jln@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01020.txt.bz2
Content-length: 478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
--- Comment #5 from Milian Wolff <mail at milianw dot de> ---
> Note the line number program should have picked up a location from the
surrounding code, at least the surrounding function, so the ?? in the
backtraces look like a consumer (perf) issue to me.
All major DWARF consumers get it wrong, no? addr2line from binutils / libbfd,
elfutils / libdwfl and also GDB - none of them find any information for
__cos_fma.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656295-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:01:20 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656295-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93902 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:01:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76384 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:00:38 -0000
From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/92081] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90 execution test
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild
Message-ID: <bug-92081-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01021.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92081
Bug ID: 92081
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
This is with trunk revision 276929.
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/obj
dir/gcc/ ../../../../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90
-B/ho
me/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp/
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hpp
a-linux-gnu/./libgomp/.libs
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp
-I../../../../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/../../include
-I../../../../gcc/libgomp/tes
tsuite/.. -fmessage-length=0 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -Wno-hsa
-fdiagnostics-
color=never -fopenmp -O0
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp/..
/libgfortran/.libs
-fintrinsic-modules-path=/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux
-gnu/./libgomp -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp/.libs
-L/hom
e/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs -lgfortran
-
foffload=-lgfortran -lm -o ./target-simd.exe
PASS: libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
.:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp/
.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./l
ibgomp/../libgfortran/.libs:.:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgomp
/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./
libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libssp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libgomp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libatomic/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./prev-gcc
Execution timeout is: 300
spawn [open ...]
corrupted size vs. prev_size
Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.
Backtrace for this error:
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90 -O0 execution test
Test fails at all optimizations.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656296-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:13:23 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656296-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38348 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:13:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38307 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:13:18 -0000
From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/92081] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-simd.f90 execution test
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-92081-4-skCIdRZKkA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92081-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92081-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01022.txt.bz2
Content-length: 151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92081
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Revision 276732 was okay.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:28:49 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74128 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:28:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74111 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:28:45 -0000
From: "bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92082] New: ICE with concepts
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-92082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01023.txt.bz2
Content-length: 965
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92082
Bug ID: 92082
Summary: ICE with concepts
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The compiler ICEs with a segmentation fault with the following code:
#include <array>
#include <map>
template <template <class ...> class ttp, class c>
struct resolve {static constexpr bool value = false; };
template <template<class ...> class ttp, class ... ts>
struct resolve<ttp, ttp<ts...>>{static constexpr bool value = true; };
template < class c, template <class ...> class ttp>
concept instanceof = resolve<ttp, c>::value;
int main()
{
instanceof<std::map> auto x = std::array<int, 3>{1, 2, 3};
}
godbolt: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/99WWSW
>From gcc-bugs-return-656298-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:51:05 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656298-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87809 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:51:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87711 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:51:01 -0000
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/58036] [meta-bug] alias.c:base_alias_check says stack accesses with different base registers don't alias
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked dependson
Message-ID: <bug-58036-4-ycN8gx3bNr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01024.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1257
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58036
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|53705, 58029, 50063, 54921 |
Depends on| |53705, 58029, 50063, 54921
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> I think the "Blocks" field might need to be swapped into the "Depends on"
> field; normally meta-bugs depend on more bugs than they block.
Thus, re-arranging
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
[Bug 50063] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] DSE: wrong code for
gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53705
[Bug 53705] wrong code with custom flags - stores to memory are lost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921
[Bug 54921] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58029
[Bug 58029] base_alias_check says pretend-args saves and varargs accesses don't
alias
>From gcc-bugs-return-656299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:55:34 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91252 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:55:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91155 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:55:30 -0000
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/49348] DW_TAG_template_* DIEs missing from template specializations
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-49348-4-RPnSlkKBl3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-49348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-49348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01025.txt.bz2
Content-length: 768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49348
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #4)
> > From Jason's feedback in response to the proposed patch, it looks like this
> > is not a bug, after all, and GCC is working as intended. Is there any
> > reason for this bug to remain open?
>
> WAITING on a reply to this
No reply; closing
>From gcc-bugs-return-656300-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:55:35 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656300-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91413 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:55:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91187 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:55:31 -0000
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/63243] [meta-bug] RH GDB project tracker
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-63243-4-WwC8LxKBX7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2
Content-length: 490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243
Bug 63243 depends on bug 49348, which changed state.
Bug 49348 Summary: DW_TAG_template_* DIEs missing from template specializations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49348
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
>From gcc-bugs-return-656301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Oct 13 22:59:51 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100279 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2019 22:59:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100220 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2019 22:59:46 -0000
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/59319] gcc does not emit DW_AT_friend or DW_TAG_friend
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59319-4-hXxDlx8CiS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59319-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59319-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01027.txt.bz2
Content-length: 205
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59319
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now that I've closed bug 49348, this is the last bug left open blocking bug
63243
>From gcc-bugs-return-656302-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 01:26:50 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656302-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108114 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 01:26:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108068 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 01:26:46 -0000
From: "tydeman at tybor dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/92083] New: -mlong-double-64 strange results
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tydeman at tybor dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-92083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01028.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92083
Bug ID: 92083
Summary: -mlong-double-64 strange results
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tydeman at tybor dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On an Intel 64-bit CPU (Core i5 7th gen), running Linux, gcc using
-mlong-double-64 gets strange results for long doubles in (at least) isnan()
and scanf().
For example, scanf() using "%Lg" to read into a long double, stores 10 bytes
(80-bit x87 format) instead of the expected 8 bytes (64-bit double format).
isnan() of a long double that is a NaN returns false.
Similar issues may also exists for <math.h> functions, printf(), <float.h>, and
<tgmath.h>.
Is there documentation on exactly what -mlong-double-64/80/128 are supposed to
do? Are they supposed to link in different libraries?
>From gcc-bugs-return-656303-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 02:02:31 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656303-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16677 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 02:02:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16645 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 02:02:26 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/92083] -mlong-double-64 strange results
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 02:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-92083-4-J3wCOiMYTH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01029.txt.bz2
Content-length: 966
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92083
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is only one ABI normally. If you use -mlong-double-64, you change the
ABI, there are no two ABIs for the glibc. You need to recompile all of glibc
(or your libc) with that option too.
The documentation is clear here too:
Warning: if you override the default value for your target ABI, this changes
the size of structures and arrays containing long double variables, as well as
modifying the function calling convention for functions taking long double.
Hence they are not binary-compatible with code compiled without that switch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 05:32:05 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25259 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 05:32:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25172 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 05:31:59 -0000
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/91860] [10 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2279 with -Og -fipa-cp -g --param=max-combine-insns=3
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 05:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zsojka at seznam dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-91860-4-WpvldbwQEM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01030.txt.bz2
Content-length: 376
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91860
--- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #9)
> Created attachment 47008 [details]
> second untested fix
Thank you for taking care about this bugreport.
I've been testing this patch for several days, and found no problems.
I will now switch back to clean trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656305-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 06:55:59 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656305-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84349 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 06:55:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84302 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 06:55:54 -0000
From: "asolokha at gmx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92084] New: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'compound_expr' in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9039
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 06:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: asolokha at gmx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-92084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01031.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92084
Bug ID: 92084
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl minimal' structure, have
'compound_expr' in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at
gimplify.c:9039
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com
Target Milestone: ---
g++-10.0.0-alpha20191013 snapshot (r276943) ICEs when compiling the following
testcase reduced from libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-5.c
w/ -std=c++17 -fopenmp:
void
vs (int *uj, int ct)
{
#pragma omp taskgroup task_reduction (* : uj[ct])
;
}
% g++-10.0.0-alpha20191013 -std=c++17 -fopenmp -c fwqikdxr.c
fwqikdxr.c: In function 'void vs(int*, int)':
fwqikdxr.c:4:9: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'compound_expr' in
gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9039
4 | #pragma omp taskgroup task_reduction (* : uj[ct])
| ^~~
0x7665f6 tree_contains_struct_check_failed(tree_node const*,
tree_node_structure_enum, char const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/tree.c:10098
0x6c3131 contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char
const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/tree.h:3381
0x6c3131 gimplify_scan_omp_clauses
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/gimplify.c:9039
0xc1da3e gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/gimplify.c:13737
0xc2391e gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/gimplify.c:6780
0xc2391e gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/gimplify.c:14385
0xc23d60 gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/gimplify.c:14529
0xab47e3 cgraph_node::analyze()
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/cgraphunit.c:667
0xab6dbd analyze_functions
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1126
0xab79ee symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191013/work/gcc-10-20191013/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2840
It also ICEs at least w/:
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-11.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-12.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-13.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-17.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-18.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-19.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-4.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-5.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-6.C
libgomp.c++/task-reduction-7.C
libgomp.c++/taskloop-reduction-2.C
libgomp.c++/taskloop-reduction-3.C
libgomp.c++/taskloop-reduction-4.C
libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-3.c
libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-7.c
libgomp.c-c++-common/task-reduction-9.c
libgomp.c-c++-common/taskloop-reduction-2.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-656306-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 07:16:42 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656306-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117367 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 07:16:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117332 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 07:16:37 -0000
From: "fiesh at zefix dot tv" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/88242] static_assertion only fires when class is templated
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fiesh at zefix dot tv
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-88242-4-hAkAl3h9RY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2
Content-length: 218
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88242
--- Comment #2 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
So from the discussion
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41785
I think this also is actually ill-formed code.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656307-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 07:20:01 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656307-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119927 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 07:20:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119838 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 07:19:57 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/91929] missing inline subroutine information in build using sin/cos
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-91929-4-ApddJbSqmg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91929-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01033.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91929
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2019-10-14
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 47029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47029&action=edit
patch for PRE
So GCC emits
.L40:
.loc 12 4459 13 is_stmt 0 view .LVU116
pxor %xmm0, %xmm0
addl $3, %ebx
movq 48(%rsp), %r13
cvtsi2sdl %r12d, %xmm0
call sin
.LVL39:
movsd %xmm0, 8(%rsp)
pxor %xmm0, %xmm0
cvtsi2sdl %ebx, %xmm0
movl %r12d, %ebx
call cos
.LVL40:
movsd 8(%rsp), %xmm2
movapd %xmm0, %xmm1
movapd %xmm2, %xmm0
call cabs
.LVL41:
.L23:
.LBB577:
.LBI577:
.loc 9 12 52 is_stmt 1 view .LVU117
where the surrounding locations are not exactly helpful (9 refers to t.C
while 12 refers to bits/stl_algo.h), but matches your observation.
GCC-wise I don't see a very good way to address this in an "exact" manner.
We'd somehow have to tell the debug consumer the stmts are from two
(multiple in general) different locations at the same time. Alternatively
we could pick one but the way PRE is implemented this could mean jumping
between one of the two (or many) alternatives for each stmt since consistency
here cannot be guaranteed.
The attached achieves that, it ends up accumulating the locations to the
end of the lambda.
(gdb) bt
#0 __cos_avx (x=3) at ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_sin.c:267
#1 0x0000000000400862 in std::cos<int> (__x=<optimized out>)
at
/home/space/rguenther/install/gcc-9.2/include/c++/9.2.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4459
#2 operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at t.C:14
#3 std::generate_n<std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<double> >, int,
main()::<lambda()> > (__n=100000, __gen=..., __first=...)
at
/home/space/rguenther/install/gcc-9.2/include/c++/9.2.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4460
#4 main () at t.C:16
>From gcc-bugs-return-656308-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 07:53:11 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656308-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94466 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 07:53:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94429 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 07:53:06 -0000
From: "rene.rahn@fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rene.rahn@fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-91607-4-SP33QYaqm1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-91607-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-91607-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01034.txt.bz2
Content-length: 445
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607
rene.rahn@fu-berlin.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rene.rahn@fu-berlin.de
--- Comment #12 from rene.rahn@fu-berlin.de ---
Hi there, I just wanted to know if there are any news about this issue?
Many thanks for your efforts.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656309-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 08:15:01 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656309-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15819 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 08:15:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13250 invoked by uid 55); 14 Oct 2019 08:14:55 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/92072] [10 Regression] ICE on include from other directory
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-92072-4-kucgiavf03@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01035.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92072
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 14 08:14:23 2019
New Revision: 276953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Fortran] PR 92072 – fix %C corner case
PR fortran/92072
* error.c (error_print, gfc_format_decoder): Fix %C column-
offset handling.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/error.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-656310-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 08:28:42 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656310-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38459 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 08:28:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38405 invoked by uid 55); 14 Oct 2019 08:28:36 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92084] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'compound_expr' in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9039
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-92084-4-ocgM5Yben1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01036.txt.bz2
Content-length: 631
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92084
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 14 08:28:05 2019
New Revision: 276954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92084
* semantics.c (handle_omp_array_sections_1): Temporarily disable
-fstrong-eval-order also for in_reduction and task_reduction clauses.
* g++.dg/gomp/pr92084.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr92084.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-656311-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 08:30:04 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656311-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43658 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 08:30:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41757 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 08:29:58 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/92084] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'compound_expr' in gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:9039
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-92084-4-wBRd59RHT7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92084-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01037.txt.bz2
Content-length: 524
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92084
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed now, thanks for the report.
>From gcc-bugs-return-656312-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 08:35:18 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656312-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60146 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 08:35:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60077 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2019 08:35:13 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/92072] [10 Regression] ICE on include from other directory
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-92072-4-vyJNM4MI9W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-92072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-92072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01038.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92072
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
FIXED.
Sorry for the ICE and thanks for bisecting and reporting!
>From gcc-bugs-return-656313-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 08:47:56 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-656313-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96803 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2019 08:47:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96789 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2019 08:47:55 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=satisfy
X-HELO: mail-wr1-f52.google.com
Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f52.google.com) (209.85.221.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:47:54 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id p14so18658128wro.4; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jvLLG9IkblnUrSP7ut+Ch9sEoUqjnkbEbau+perqzOI=; b=IZVzD9zJrlJ0m4ajXn9XMfscVEuR6GvFSqiB5Rg3ZYxB3fz5fhQx46tsFzu9QNbo+E g2iHiYONcgs+AHe1oc+ni719X6TbjGinAE60N+9Kv5K8oJM0EiqgxwCO7t6EPSLLx2B7 sEHy5cyrKKmfMF1TF6aUs1GPM2CN/19z7Y4ruypd9T7eezslfgUFXoeEkzyQR8x5R0L7 SP9d0K3vQztjO5OWx9lP7TmwdcwnPvkNzZOUkuOIzq71CBhJAjs+XEOnoY8wxlf0QBGC cOG+KKpEtUWIKgAgEcAQzbmA1Jr3KY0eYE1K3Aqicccm9gIPVXyfP9bsHtc7u04rf0Aq a9ow=MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BL0PR02MB4484F0BF57A4D1B32D573DDBB2910@BL0PR02MB4484.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR02MB4484F0BF57A4D1B32D573DDBB2910@BL0PR02MB4484.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdS57oRB8_YEhnA5aP4mH5993S-RGgZHSeiHy51hPL5bjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: template auto deduction ICE in the latest gcc master version.
To: sotrdg sotrdg <euloanty@live.com>
Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01039.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1551
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 19:31, sotrdg sotrdg <euloanty@live.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/euloanty/fast_io/blob/master/examples/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc
>
>
>
> cqwrteur@DESKTOP-7H7UHQ9:/mnt/d/hg/fast_io/examples/build$ ninja
> [1/2] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/iostrm.dir/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc.o
> FAILED: CMakeFiles/iostrm.dir/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc.o
> /usr/local/bin/c++ -O3 -DNDEBUG -fconcepts -ffast-math -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu++2a -MD -MT CMakeFiles/iostrm.dir/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc.o -MF CMakeFiles/iostrm.dir/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc.o.d -o CMakeFiles/iostrm.dir/0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc.o -c ../0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc
> ../0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
> ../0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc:8:51: error: deduced initializer does not satisfy placeholder constraints
> 8 | fast_io::stream auto fin(std::ifstream("abc.txt"));
> | ^
> ../0036.concepts_check/iostrm.cc:8:51: note: constraints not satisfied
> c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
This has nothing to do with libstdc++, and bugs should be reported to
bugzilla not by sending email to the gcc-bugs list (which is for
automated replies from bugzilla only).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK
[not found] <bug-87243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2019-10-13 19:35 ` [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
@ 2021-11-30 8:09 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 8:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |fink at snaggledworks dot com,
| |ken.cunningham.webuse@gmail
| |.com
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #14)
> Related downstream issue from MacPorts:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59113
(that's fixed now, btw... ok to close this now as well?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK
[not found] <bug-87243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2019-10-13 19:35 ` [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
2021-11-30 8:09 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-30 8:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed on open branches
(As described in the various comments, I do not intend to spawn xcrun from the
compiler - neither does clang).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-30 8:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-87243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2019-10-13 19:35 ` [Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
2021-11-30 8:09 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 8:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).