public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-04-06 20:17 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-16 21:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-06 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0, 9.2.0
Last reconfirmed|2019-03-13 00:00:00 |2021-4-6
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed with GCC 11.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-06 20:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-16 21:29 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-19 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-16 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|9.2.0 |4.3.0, 4.8.4, 4.9.4, 5.5.0,
| |6.4.0, 7.2.0, 8.3.0, 9.1.0
Summary|SRA prevents |[9/10/11 Regression] SRA
|-Wuninitialized warning |prevents -Wuninitialized
| |warning
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bisection points to r128908 as the first revision when GCC failed to warn.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-06 20:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-16 21:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-19 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-19 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-19 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-22 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-22 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #1)
> This is because we set TREE_NO_WARNING in generate_subtree_copies. I'll
> remove it, see what breaks and take it from there.
Did you ever see what's the result of this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-22 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-22 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-22 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note, in GCC 12 you can suppress only selected set of warnings.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [10/11/12/13 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-22 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [10/11/12/13 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [11/12/13/14 Regression] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-89697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-06 20:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] SRA prevents -Wuninitialized warning msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-16 21:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11 Regression] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-19 7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/89697] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).