public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/90058] False Positive in undefined-sanitizer only with GCC8
[not found] <bug-90058-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-04-06 21:16 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-06 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90058
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can reproduce the warning with GCC 8 but not 9. GCC 10 doesn't compile the
code anymore so I can't test it there. GCC 8 takes 70 seconds to churn through
all the code so that's seems too long to reduce it to a small enough test case
for an outdated compiler/concepts implementation. Given that -Wuninitialized
has lot of known problems, both with and without sanitizers, I'm going to
resolve this as WORKSFORSOME.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-06 21:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-90058-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-04-06 21:16 ` [Bug c++/90058] False Positive in undefined-sanitizer only with GCC8 msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).