public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/90381] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c fails with its introduction in r270934
       [not found] <bug-90381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-08-24  9:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-24 21:18 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-24  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90381

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Are bitfields allocated right to left on all LE configs?

I think the majority of them, I have not used one which does the opposite.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/90381] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c fails with its introduction in r270934
       [not found] <bug-90381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-08-24  9:24 ` [Bug testsuite/90381] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c fails with its introduction in r270934 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-24 21:18 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-24 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90381

--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> > Are bitfields allocated right to left on all LE configs?
> 
> I think the majority of them, I have not used one which does the opposite.

Of course.  But my point was, the testcase is somewhat fragile as written.
Perhaps we should have a selector for the bitfield allocation direction.  Or,
alternatively, if this testcase is the only one using this that would be
overkill of course.  A comment that explains things will help then!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-24 21:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-90381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-08-24  9:24 ` [Bug testsuite/90381] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c fails with its introduction in r270934 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-24 21:18 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).