public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-12 11:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-18 18:09 ` law at redhat dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-18 18:09 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-05-08 17:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11 " asolokha at gmx dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-18 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Yea, I think a NOTE_INSN_DELETED is valid in that location. So yea, using
NEXT_INSN is probably wrong and we should be using something else like
next_nonnote_insn. My only worry with next_nonnote_insn would be if it skipped
something like a block note. What would be the implications for the scheduler
if it walked through the various note insns?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-18 18:09 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-05-08 17:12 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-01 8:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2020-05-08 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> ---
I cannot reproduce it on master and w/ gcc-10.1.0-RC-20200430, regardless of
-checking. It still fails on the 9 branch w/ -fchecking.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-08 17:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11 " asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2021-06-01 8:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-20 6:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-20 6:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-20 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Btw. one can't see it on master after r10-4444-g7313607478c11e94.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-20 6:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 23:18 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Btw. one can't see it on master after r10-4444-g7313607478c11e94.
But if you do:
```
[[gnu::noinline, noreturn]]
void
ni ()
```
You can reproduce it except it is no longe reproducible in GCC 13+ though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 23:18 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-02-22 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs-bisection
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I looked into the IR between GCC 12 and GCC 13 (with the added attributes),
before sched2 there is no difference. So it would good to see what change
"fixes" this again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-02-22 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-02-22 23:18 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
10 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2024-02-22 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> I looked into the IR between GCC 12 and GCC 13 (with the added attributes),
> before sched2 there is no difference. So it would good to see what change
> "fixes" this again.
The bug went latent by r13-2726.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-22 23:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-91161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-18 18:09 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-05-08 17:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11 " asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-01 8:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-20 6:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 22:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 23:18 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).