public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow
[not found] <bug-91547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-07-25 18:07 ` vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:07 ` vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vlovich at gmail dot com @ 2022-07-25 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
Vitali <vlovich at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vlovich at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from Vitali <vlovich at gmail dot com> ---
FWIW clang does implement this. Even if the maintainers disagree on the utility
in practice, does feature parity for command-line options with Clang change the
calculus?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow
[not found] <bug-91547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-07-25 18:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow vlovich at gmail dot com
@ 2022-07-25 18:07 ` vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vlovich at gmail dot com @ 2022-07-25 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
--- Comment #5 from Vitali <vlovich at gmail dot com> ---
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow
[not found] <bug-91547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-07-25 18:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:07 ` vlovich at gmail dot com
@ 2022-07-25 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-25 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vitali from comment #4)
> FWIW clang does implement this. Even if the maintainers disagree on the
> utility in practice, does feature parity for command-line options with Clang
> change the calculus?
See the thread: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2016-07/msg00051.html .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-25 18:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-91547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-07-25 18:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/91547] std::string_view find_last_not_of can trigger unsigned integer overflow vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:07 ` vlovich at gmail dot com
2022-07-25 18:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).