public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ipa/92538] Proposal for IPA init() constant propagation
       [not found] <bug-92538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-07-20  9:31 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-05-02  7:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-20  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92538

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Aldyh,

I've been wondering for a while now whether something like this would be a
better fit into Ranger's on-demand analysis.

It seems like that has much of the needed machinery already and we wouldn't
need to insert writes to propagate the constant information?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug ipa/92538] Proposal for IPA init() constant propagation
       [not found] <bug-92538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-07-20  9:31 ` [Bug ipa/92538] Proposal for IPA init() constant propagation tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-02  7:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-02  7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92538

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Martin,

this is the IPA pass I was talking about at the cauldron.

I see the patch doesn't have any standalone testcases. Do you have some Erick?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-02  7:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-92538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-07-20  9:31 ` [Bug ipa/92538] Proposal for IPA init() constant propagation tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-02  7:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).