public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-07-23 16:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2021-05-15  1:58 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-23 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-07-23
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Priority|P3                          |P4

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Select rank mishandles allocatable and pointer arguments when using bind(c) with:

AFACT only when the arrays are not allocated.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-07-23 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c) dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2021-05-15  1:58 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-15  3:44 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-15  1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fiddling with the test case a bit, I observe that the RANK() intrinsic returns
the correct result even in the functions where SELECT RANK fails.  Seems odd
that SELECT RANK uses different logic.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-07-23 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c) dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2021-05-15  1:58 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-15  3:44 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-19 18:07 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-15  3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #2)
> Fiddling with the test case a bit, I observe that the RANK() intrinsic
> returns the correct result even in the functions where SELECT RANK fails. 
> Seems odd that SELECT RANK uses different logic.

Why?  The code for SELECT RANK was added in 2019 and code for
RANK() was added sometime around 2011.  It seems the individuals,
who committed each feature, are different people.  At least, one
of the two took a very long hiatus from working on gfortran, and
the other seems not to be omniscient.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-15  3:44 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-19 18:07 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-30 20:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-19 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-19 18:07 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-30 20:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2021-05-30 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Patch posted:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html


The patch fixes this PR, see also pr94331.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-30 20:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-14 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

--- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Updated patch:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-26 12:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-19 13:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-14 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

--- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 51015
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51015&action=edit
Updated patch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-26 12:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-19 13:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-26 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus <burnus@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c

commit r12-2511-g0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c
Author: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 26 14:20:46 2021 +0200

    PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor
handling

    Fortran: Fix attributes and bounds in ISO_Fortran_binding.

    2021-07-26  José Rui Faustino de Sousa  <jrfsousa@gmail.com>
                Tobias Burnus  <tobias@codesourcery.com>

            PR fortran/93308
            PR fortran/93963
            PR fortran/94327
            PR fortran/94331
            PR fortran/97046

    gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

            * trans-decl.c (convert_CFI_desc): Only copy out the descriptor
            if necessary.
            * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc): Updated attribute
            handling which reflect a previous intermediate version of the
            standard. Only copy out the descriptor if necessary.

    libgfortran/ChangeLog:

            * runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c (cfi_desc_to_gfc_desc): Add code
            to verify the descriptor. Correct bounds calculation.
            (gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc): Add code to verify the descriptor.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_1.f90: Add pointer attribute,
            this test is still erroneous but now it compiles.
            * gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90: Update regex to match
            code changes.
            * gfortran.dg/PR93308.f90: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR93963.f90: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR94327.c: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR94327.f90: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR94331.c: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR94331.f90: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/PR97046.f90: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)
       [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-07-26 12:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-19 13:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-19 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Close as FIXED (in GCC 12) by the big patch.

I tried the full testcases of the submitted patch (PR93308.f90  PR93963.f90 
PR94327.c  PR94327.f90  PR94331.c  PR94331.f90  PR97046.f90) and also 

Thanks José for report and testcases - and again sorry for no prompt review of
your patches.
(It helps to ping them regularly.)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-19 13:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-93963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-23 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c) dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-05-15  1:58 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-15  3:44 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-19 18:07 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-30 20:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-14 23:19 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-26 12:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-19 13:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).