public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94092] Code size and performance degradations after -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns was enabled at -O[2s]+ Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 06:28:26 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-94092-4-zOlHaBzjRk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-94092-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Fri, 30 Apr 2021, law at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092 > > Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > WRT Jim's comment about alignments in c#6. > > Right now a pointer's alignment is really only used to eliminate unnecessary > masking -- we don't propagate a pointer's known alignment to improve the known > alignment of memory operations involving that pointer. Hmm, but we do - in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos. But maybe below is for way later RTL generation, > This is something I'd cobbled together for a closely related issue which will > try to increase the known alignment of a MEM by using the alignment of a > pointer to that MEM. > > We've gone a slightly different (and more effective) route for that internal > issue, but this may still be worth polishing a bit and submitting. > > diff --git a/gcc/emit-rtl.c b/gcc/emit-rtl.c > index 972512e81..be9ff76b5 100644 > --- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c > +++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c > @@ -859,6 +859,28 @@ gen_rtx_MEM (machine_mode mode, rtx addr) > we clear it here. */ > MEM_ATTRS (rt) = 0; > > + /* If we can deduce a higher alignment for the memory access > + based on the pointer, then it's advantageous to do so. */ > + unsigned int align = 0; > + if (REG_P (addr) > + && REG_POINTER (addr)) > + align = REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (REGNO (addr)); > + else if (GET_CODE (addr) == PLUS > + && REG_P (XEXP (addr, 0)) > + && REG_POINTER (XEXP (addr, 0)) > + && REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (REGNO (XEXP (addr, 0))) > + && GET_CODE (XEXP (addr, 1)) == CONST_INT) > + { > + unsigned int tmp = 1 << (ffs_hwi (INTVAL (XEXP (addr, 1))) - 1); > + /* ALIGN is in bits. */ > + tmp <<= 3; > + align = REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (REGNO (XEXP (addr, 0))); > + align = (align > tmp) ? tmp : align; > + } > + > + if (align > mode_mem_attrs[(int) mode]->align) > + set_mem_align (rt, align); > + > return rt; > } > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-03 6:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-09 6:06 [Bug tree-optimization/94092] New: " bina2374 at gmail dot com 2020-03-09 6:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94092] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-09 6:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-09 6:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-09 7:37 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-09 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-19 8:05 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-23 23:57 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-24 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-24 9:05 ` bina2374 at gmail dot com 2021-02-24 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-26 6:35 ` bina2374 at gmail dot com 2021-03-03 6:30 ` bina2374 at gmail dot com 2021-03-03 8:03 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2021-04-29 4:24 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-30 14:38 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-03 6:28 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message] 2021-05-04 12:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-94092-4-zOlHaBzjRk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).