public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
@ 2020-03-09  9:43 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-09 13:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94094] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-09  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094

            Bug ID: 94094
           Summary: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap
                    load/store-merging missed optimizations
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Bug tracking missed cases, both passes could/should be merged.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
  2020-03-09  9:43 [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-09 13:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-10 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-09 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The two passes share infrastructure for the bswap discovery etc., but otherwise
they aren't dependent on each other.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
  2020-03-09  9:43 [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-09 13:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94094] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-03-10 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-07-13 22:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-13 14:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-03-10 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094
Bug 94094 depends on bug 108874, which changed state.

Bug 108874 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
  2020-03-09  9:43 [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-09 13:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94094] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-10 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-13 22:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-13 14:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-13 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-07-13
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
  2020-03-09  9:43 [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-07-13 22:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-13 14:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-13 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094
Bug 94094 depends on bug 114319, which changed state.

Bug 114319 Summary: htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-13 14:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-09  9:43 [Bug tree-optimization/94094] New: [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-09 13:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94094] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-10 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-13 22:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-13 14:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).