public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
@ 2020-03-12 22:39 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-12 22:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/94160] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

            Bug ID: 94160
           Summary: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes
                    pool resources to return null pointers
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

This calculation in __pool_resource::_M_alloc_pools() can result in
blocks_per_chunk being set to zero, and then _Pool::allocate always returns
null:

        blocks_per_chunk
          = std::min(blocks_per_chunk, _M_opts.max_blocks_per_chunk);
        // Allow space for bitset to track which blocks are used/unused:
        blocks_per_chunk *= 1 - 1.0 / (__CHAR_BIT__ * block_size);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-12 22:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-10 13:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-03-12
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-12 22:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/94160] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-10 13:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-10 14:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-10 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Testcase:

#include <memory_resource>

int main()
{
  std::pmr::unsynchronized_pool_resource upr({ 1, 32 });
  auto* p = (int*)upr.allocate(4);
  *p = 0;
  return *p;
}

The returned pointer is null, leading to a segfault.

If libstdc++ is built with assertions enabled, the allocation aborts with:

../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/memory_resource.cc:294:
std::pmr::{anonymous}::bitset::bitset(void*,
std::pmr::{anonymous}::bitset::size_type): Assertion 'empty()' failed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-03-12 22:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/94160] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-10 13:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-10 14:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-10 14:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-10 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30b41cfbb2dade63e52465234a725d1d02fe70aa

commit r11-3102-g30b41cfbb2dade63e52465234a725d1d02fe70aa
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 10 15:39:15 2020 +0100

    libstdc++: handle small max_blocks_per_chunk in pool resources [PR 94160]

    When a pool resource is constructed with max_blocks_per_chunk=1 it ends
    up creating a pool with blocks_per_chunk=0 which means it never
    allocates anything. Instead it returns null pointers, which should be
    impossible.

    To avoid this problem, round the max_blocks_per_chunk value to a
    multiple of four, so it's never smaller than four.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/94160
            * src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (munge_options): Round
            max_blocks_per_chunk to a multiple of four.
            (__pool_resource::_M_alloc_pools()): Simplify slightly.
            * testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc:
            Check that valid pointers are returned when small values are
            used for max_blocks_per_chunk.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-10 14:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-10 14:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-21 20:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-10 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk so far, but I plan to backport it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-10 14:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-21 20:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-21 23:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-21 23:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-21 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ae110d4f8edd61cf56ee5fea62cadc8e781e8dc

commit r10-8780-g9ae110d4f8edd61cf56ee5fea62cadc8e781e8dc
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 10 15:39:15 2020 +0100

    libstdc++: handle small max_blocks_per_chunk in pool resources [PR 94160]

    When a pool resource is constructed with max_blocks_per_chunk=1 it ends
    up creating a pool with blocks_per_chunk=0 which means it never
    allocates anything. Instead it returns null pointers, which should be
    impossible.

    To avoid this problem, round the max_blocks_per_chunk value to a
    multiple of four, so it's never smaller than four.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/94160
            * src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (munge_options): Round
            max_blocks_per_chunk to a multiple of four.
            (__pool_resource::_M_alloc_pools()): Simplify slightly.
            * testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc:
            Check that valid pointers are returned when small values are
            used for max_blocks_per_chunk.

    (cherry picked from commit 30b41cfbb2dade63e52465234a725d1d02fe70aa)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-21 20:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-21 23:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-21 23:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-21 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdaf0ce0af30dfedac61ea1a7e842a45e55deb25

commit r9-8924-gbdaf0ce0af30dfedac61ea1a7e842a45e55deb25
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 10 15:39:15 2020 +0100

    libstdc++: handle small max_blocks_per_chunk in pool resources [PR 94160]

    When a pool resource is constructed with max_blocks_per_chunk=1 it ends
    up creating a pool with blocks_per_chunk=0 which means it never
    allocates anything. Instead it returns null pointers, which should be
    impossible.

    To avoid this problem, round the max_blocks_per_chunk value to a
    multiple of four, so it's never smaller than four.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/94160
            * src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (munge_options): Round
            max_blocks_per_chunk to a multiple of four.
            (__pool_resource::_M_alloc_pools()): Simplify slightly.
            * testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc:
            Check that valid pointers are returned when small values are
            used for max_blocks_per_chunk.

    (cherry picked from commit 30b41cfbb2dade63e52465234a725d1d02fe70aa)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/94160] std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers
  2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-21 23:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-21 23:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-21 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94160

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.4

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 9.4 and 10.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-21 23:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-12 22:39 [Bug libstdc++/94160] New: std::pmr::pool_options::max_blocks_per_chunk=1 causes pool resources to return null pointers redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-12 22:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/94160] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 13:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 14:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 14:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-21 20:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-21 23:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-21 23:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).