public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
@ 2020-04-16 20:50 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-16 20:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-16 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
Bug ID: 94627
Summary: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality
comparisons should not be noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This should exit cleanly:
#include <regex>
struct iterator
{
using value_type = char;
using difference_type = std::ptrdiff_t;
using reference = char&;
using pointer = char*;
using iterator_category = std::bidirectional_iterator_tag;
iterator() : ptr() { }
explicit iterator(pointer p) : ptr(p) { }
iterator& operator++() { if (bang) throw 1; ++ptr; return *this; }
iterator operator++(int) { auto copy = *this; ++*this; return copy; }
iterator& operator--() { if (bang) throw 1; --ptr; return *this; }
iterator operator--(int) { auto copy = *this; --*this; return copy; }
reference operator*() const noexcept { return *ptr; }
pointer operator->() const noexcept { return ptr; }
bool operator==(iterator rhs) const noexcept { return ptr == rhs.ptr; }
bool operator!=(iterator rhs) const noexcept { return ptr != rhs.ptr; }
static bool bang;
private:
pointer ptr;
};
bool iterator::bang = false;
int main()
{
char str[] = "abc";
std::regex r(str);
std::match_results<iterator> m;
std::regex_match(iterator(str), iterator(str+3), m, r);
iterator::bang = true;
try {
m == m;
} catch (int) {
}
}
Since g:c962b2c36f12 it terninates because I incorrectly added noexcept to the
operator== and operator!= for std::match_results
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-16 20:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-16 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |8.4.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to fail| |10.0, 9.1.0
Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-16
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-16 20:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-17 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 20:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10/11 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-17 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10/11 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-16 20:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-01 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 21:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-01 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1a0dc4548979f8a340a7ea71624a52a20e1e0b3
commit r11-1770-ga1a0dc4548979f8a340a7ea71624a52a20e1e0b3
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jul 1 21:01:15 2020 +0100
libstdc++: Remove noexcept from match_results comparisons (PR 94627)
These functions can't be noexcept because the iterators stored in the
sub_match objects can throw on any operation.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/94627
* include/bits/regex.h (operator==, operator!=): Remove noexcept
equality comparisons for match_results.
* testsuite/28_regex/match_results/94627.cc: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-01 20:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10/11 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-01 21:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 22:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 22:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-01 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<redi@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c994586cbd40a33f223aaaf90887afe97208543
commit r10-8409-g4c994586cbd40a33f223aaaf90887afe97208543
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jul 1 21:01:15 2020 +0100
libstdc++: Remove noexcept from match_results comparisons (PR 94627)
These functions can't be noexcept because the iterators stored in the
sub_match objects can throw on any operation.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/94627
* include/bits/regex.h (operator==, operator!=): Remove noexcept
equality comparisons for match_results.
* testsuite/28_regex/match_results/94627.cc: New test.
(cherry picked from commit a1a0dc4548979f8a340a7ea71624a52a20e1e0b3)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-01 21:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-01 22:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 22:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-01 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<redi@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4490e7771e4df28427cca5e113afe58a7fff8d5
commit r9-8713-ge4490e7771e4df28427cca5e113afe58a7fff8d5
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jul 1 21:01:15 2020 +0100
libstdc++: Remove noexcept from match_results comparisons (PR 94627)
These functions can't be noexcept because the iterators stored in the
sub_match objects can throw on any operation.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/94627
* include/bits/regex.h (operator==, operator!=): Remove noexcept
equality comparisons for match_results.
* testsuite/28_regex/match_results/94627.cc: New test.
(cherry picked from commit a1a0dc4548979f8a340a7ea71624a52a20e1e0b3)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-01 22:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-01 22:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-01 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 9.4 and 10.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-01 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-16 20:50 [Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-16 20:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 20:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10/11 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 21:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 22:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 22:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).