public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 02:22:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-95130-4-gLyq2YVODF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-95130-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130

--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong <jyong@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:966f3c134bb4802ac7ba0517de4e8e3f6384cfa3

commit r14-3334-g966f3c134bb4802ac7ba0517de4e8e3f6384cfa3
Author: Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Aug 20 02:16:16 2023 +0000

    Fix format attribute for printf

    Since a long time (GCC 4.4?) GCC does support annotating functions
    with either the format attribute "gnu_printf" or "ms_printf" to
    distinguish between different format string interpretations.

    However, it seems like the attribute is ignored for the "printf"
    symbol; regardless what the function declaration says, GCC treats
    it as "ms_printf". This has become an issue now that mingw-w64
    supports using the UCRT instead of msvcrt.dll, and in this case
    the stdio functions are declared with the gnu_printf attribute,
    and inttypes.h uses the same format specifiers as in GNU mode.

    A reproducible example of the problem:

    $ cat format.c
    __attribute__((__format__ (gnu_printf, 1, 2))) int printf (const char
*__format, ...);
    __attribute__((__format__ (gnu_printf, 1, 2))) int othername (const char
*__format, ...);

    void function(void) {
        long long unsigned x = 42;
        othername("%llu\n", x);
        printf("%llu\n", x);
    }
    $ x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -Wformat format.c
    format.c: In function 'function':
    format.c:7:15: warning: unknown conversion type character 'l' in format
[-Wformat=]
        7 |     printf("%llu\n", x);
          |               ^
    format.c:7:12: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
        7 |     printf("%llu\n", x);
          |            ^~~~~~~~

    Note how both functions, printf and othername, are declare with
    identical gnu_printf format attributes - GCC does take this into
    account for "othername" and doesn't produce a warning, but GCC
    seems to disregard the attribute in the printf declaration and
    behave as if it was declared as ms_printf.

    If the printf function declaration is changed into a static inline
    function, the actual attribute used is honored though.

    gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:

            PR c/95130
            * c-format.cc: skip default format for printf symbol if
            explicitly declared by prototype.

    Signed-off-by: Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10walls@gmail.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-20  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14 11:37 [Bug c/95130] New: " martin at martin dot st
2020-05-14 17:27 ` [Bug c/95130] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2021-11-22 21:21 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-15 17:27 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-15 17:29 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-15 17:45 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-10-25  7:10 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2022-10-25 16:46 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 19:40 ` martin at martin dot st
2022-10-26  7:03 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-10-26 10:09 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2022-10-26 12:04 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-10-26 15:27 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-12-15 15:42 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2023-01-29 18:20 ` alvinhochun at gmail dot com
2023-08-02  2:06 ` tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
2023-08-02 13:15 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2023-08-03 16:33 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2023-08-17  6:11 ` tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
2023-08-19 10:18 ` tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
2023-08-19 19:11 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2023-08-20  2:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-08-21 12:50 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2024-04-19  2:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-19  3:28 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2024-04-19  7:04 ` martin at martin dot st
2024-04-19  7:12 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2024-04-19  7:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-19  7:27 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-95130-4-gLyq2YVODF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).