public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/95262] New: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution
@ 2020-05-21 18:26 barry.revzin at gmail dot com
2020-06-22 13:38 ` [Bug c++/95262] Taking address of function pointer doesn't " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-18 16:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: barry.revzin at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-21 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95262
Bug ID: 95262
Summary: Taking address of function pointer do full concept
overload resolution
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: barry.revzin at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Reduced from StackOverflow (https://stackoverflow.com/q/61941173/2069064):
template <typename> int f() { return 0; }
template <typename> requires true int f() { return 1; }
int (*p)() = &f<int>;
gcc complains that converting the function is ambiguous even though the second
overload is a better candidate than the first. clang accepts.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95262] Taking address of function pointer doesn't do full concept overload resolution
2020-05-21 18:26 [Bug c++/95262] New: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution barry.revzin at gmail dot com
@ 2020-06-22 13:38 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-18 16:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-22 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95262
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-22
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/95262] Taking address of function pointer doesn't do full concept overload resolution
2020-05-21 18:26 [Bug c++/95262] New: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution barry.revzin at gmail dot com
2020-06-22 13:38 ` [Bug c++/95262] Taking address of function pointer doesn't " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-18 16:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-18 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95262
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 10.3 and 11 by r11-2634 / r10-8627.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-18 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-21 18:26 [Bug c++/95262] New: Taking address of function pointer do full concept overload resolution barry.revzin at gmail dot com
2020-06-22 13:38 ` [Bug c++/95262] Taking address of function pointer doesn't " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-18 16:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).