public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text
@ 2020-06-02 20:14 msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:15 ` [Bug middle-end/95485] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-02 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Bug ID: 95485
Summary: missing warning writing into function text
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
GCC doesn't diagnose attempts to write into functions, even though those will
in all likelihood crash with a SIGBUS at runtime.
For example, in the following snippet the destination of the memset call is a
function rather than the memory it was called to obtain. The memset call
should be diagnosed.
$ cat z.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout z.c
typedef void* F (int);
void* f (F *p)
{
void *q = p (32); // allocate memory
__builtin_memset (p, 0, 32); // zero out -- whoops! -- writing to a
function
return q; // return "clear" memory
}
;; Function f (f, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1933, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)
f (void * (*<T322>) (int) p)
{
void * q;
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
q_4 = p_2(D) (32);
__builtin_memset (p_2(D), 0, 32);
return q_4;
}
Two compilers on Godbolt diagnose the code: Visual C++:
z.c(8): warning C4152: nonstandard extension, function/data pointer conversion
in expression
and the Small Device C Compiler (SDCC):
x.c:8: warning 244: pointer types incompatible
from type 'void generic* function ( int fixed) code* fixed'
to type 'void generic* fixed'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-02 20:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-02 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Severity|normal |enhancement
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:15 ` [Bug middle-end/95485] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-02 20:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-03 5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-02 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-06-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=90404
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
See also pr90404. I'm working on a solution for that, and I expect it to
handle this as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:15 ` [Bug middle-end/95485] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-03 5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-03 16:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-03 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-Wpedantic catches it:
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc -c -O2 -S -Wall -Wextra -pedantic
-fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout 95485.c
95485.c: In function 'f':
95485.c:6:20: warning: ISO C forbids passing argument 1 of '__builtin_memset'
between function pointer and 'void *' [-Wpedantic]
6 | __builtin_memset (p, 0, 32); // zero out -- whoops! -- writing to a
function
| ^
95485.c:6:20: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'void * (*)(int)'
;; Function f (f, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1910, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)
f (void * (*<T318>) (int) p)
{
void * q;
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
q_4 = p_2(D) (32);
__builtin_memset (p_2(D), 0, 32);
return q_4;
}
$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-03 5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-03 16:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-04 6:51 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-26 17:55 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-03 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, yes, -Wpedantic does detect the invalid conversion. But few projects use
-Wpedantic (GCC itself doesn't) and enabling the warning in -Wall or -Wextra
would likely lead to lots of noise for code that converts between object and
function pointers (POSIX requires it to work).
A warning implemented in a front end can also only detect questionable
conversions but not the actual writes, which is what the warning I'm working on
does (i.e., detect stores into read-only storage).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-03 16:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-04 6:51 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-26 17:55 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-04 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> Ah, yes, -Wpedantic does detect the invalid conversion. But few projects
> use -Wpedantic (GCC itself doesn't) and enabling the warning in -Wall or
> -Wextra would likely lead to lots of noise for code that converts between
> object and function pointers (POSIX requires it to work).
>
> A warning implemented in a front end can also only detect questionable
> conversions but not the actual writes, which is what the warning I'm working
> on does (i.e., detect stores into read-only storage).
so... you're suggesting a new flag, then?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95485] missing warning writing into function text
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-04 6:51 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-26 17:55 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-26 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95485
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Blocks| |87403
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm not working on this anymore.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-26 17:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-02 20:14 [Bug middle-end/95485] New: missing warning writing into function text msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:15 ` [Bug middle-end/95485] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-02 20:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-03 5:05 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-03 16:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-04 6:51 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-26 17:55 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).