public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
@ 2020-06-04 18:16 gscfq@t-online.de
  2020-06-04 18:17 ` [Bug fortran/95544] " gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2020-06-04 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

            Bug ID: 95544
           Summary: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at
                    fortran/trans-decl.c:494
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
  Target Milestone: ---

Affects versions down to at least r5 :


$ cat z1.f90
program p
   character(:), allocatable :: z
   print *, adjustl(null(z))
   print *, adjustr(null(z))
end


$ cat z2.f90
program p
   character(:), pointer :: z
   print *, adjustl(null(z))
   print *, adjustr(null(z))
end


$ gfortran-11-20200531 -c z1.f90
z1.f90:3:0:

    3 |    print *, adjustl(null(z))
      |
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xbc37bf crash_signal
        ../../gcc/toplev.c:328
0x720000 gfc_can_put_var_on_stack(tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:494
0x72edb8 gfc_conv_string_tmp(gfc_se*, tree_node*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3378
0x745c66 gfc_conv_intrinsic_adjust
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:8201
0x75ab1b gfc_conv_intrinsic_function(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:10038
0x73205a gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:8682
0x738ef2 gfc_conv_expr_reference(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*, bool)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:8782
0x761687 gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2582
0x7017f7 trans_code
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2084
0x75f16e build_dt
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2026
0x7017d7 trans_code
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2056
0x72ad24 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:6840
0x6b25e6 translate_all_program_units
        ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6306
0x6b25e6 gfc_parse_file()
        ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6545
0x6fdfff gfc_be_parse_file
        ../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:210

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2020-06-04 18:17 ` gscfq@t-online.de
  2020-06-04 21:09 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2020-06-04 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

G. Steinmetz <gscfq@t-online.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code

--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz <gscfq@t-online.de> ---

Related :


$ cat za1.f90
program p
   character(:), allocatable :: z
   print *, len(null(z))
   print *, len_trim(null(z))
end


$ cat za2.f90
program p
   character(:), pointer :: z
   print *, len(null(z))
   print *, len_trim(null(z))
end


$ cat zz1.f90
program p
   character(:), allocatable :: z
   z = trim(null(z))
end

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
  2020-06-04 18:17 ` [Bug fortran/95544] " gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2020-06-04 21:09 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-04 21:27 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-04 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-06-04
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There may be a better (or more restrictive) test, but this cures the issues.

Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c     (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c     (working copy)
@@ -4428,6 +4428,19 @@ check_arglist (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_intrinsic_
          return false;
        }

+      /* F2018, p. 328: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than
+        ASSOCIATED, NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  A EXPR_NULL
+        is not a data object.  */
+      if (actual->expr->expr_type == EXPR_NULL
+         && !(strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "associated") == 0
+               || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "null") == 0
+               || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "present") == 0))
+       {
+         gfc_error ("NULL() at %L cannot appear as an actual argument in %qs",
+                    &actual->expr->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+         return false;
+       }
+
       /* If the formal argument is INTENT([IN]OUT), check for definability. 
*/
       if (formal->intent == INTENT_INOUT || formal->intent == INTENT_OUT)
        {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
  2020-06-04 18:17 ` [Bug fortran/95544] " gscfq@t-online.de
  2020-06-04 21:09 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-04 21:27 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-04 23:06 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-04 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Updated patch to deal with comments #1.

Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c     (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c     (working copy)
@@ -4428,6 +4428,19 @@ check_arglist (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_intrinsic_
          return false;
        }

+      /* F2018, p. 328: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than
+        ASSOCIATED, NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  A EXPR_NULL
+        is not a data object.  */
+      if (actual->expr->expr_type == EXPR_NULL
+         && !(strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "associated") == 0
+               || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "null") == 0
+               || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "present") == 0))
+       {
+         gfc_error ("NULL() at %L cannot appear as an actual argument in %qs",
+                    &actual->expr->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+         return false;
+       }
+
       /* If the formal argument is INTENT([IN]OUT), check for definability. 
*/
       if (formal->intent == INTENT_INOUT || formal->intent == INTENT_OUT)
        {
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
@@ -3444,8 +3444,16 @@ gfc_check_len_lentrim (gfc_expr *s, gfc_expr *kind)
   if (!type_check (s, 0, BT_CHARACTER))
     return false;

+  if (s->expr_type == EXPR_NULL)
+    {
+      gfc_error ("Intrinsic function NULL at %L cannot be an actual "
+                "argument to %qs", &s->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+      return false;
+    }
+
   if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER))
     return false;
+
   if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic "
                               "with KIND argument at %L",
                               gfc_current_intrinsic, &kind->where))
@@ -6377,6 +6385,13 @@ gfc_check_trim (gfc_expr *x)
 {
   if (!type_check (x, 0, BT_CHARACTER))
     return false;
+
+  if (x->expr_type == EXPR_NULL)
+    {
+      gfc_error ("Intrinsic function NULL at %L cannot be an actual "
+                "argument to %qs", &x->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+      return false;
+    }

   if (!scalar_check (x, 0))
     return false;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-04 21:27 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-04 23:06 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
  2020-06-08 20:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu @ 2020-06-04 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
Likely, want to include this in the commit if someone ever gets
around to committing the patch(es).

Index: gcc/fortran/misc.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/misc.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/misc.c (working copy)
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ gfc_dummy_typename (gfc_typespec *ts)
  has_length = ts->u.cl->length != NULL;
       if (!has_length)
  {
-   if (ts->kind == gfc_default_character_kind)
+   if (ts->kind == gfc_default_character_kind
+       || ts->kind == 0)
      sprintf(buffer, "CHARACTER(*)");
    else if (ts->kind < 10)
      sprintf(buffer, "CHARACTER(*,%d)", ts->kind);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-04 23:06 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
@ 2020-06-08 20:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-08 20:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-08 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 48708
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48708&action=edit
Cleaned up patch

Hi Steve,

since there is already a function invalid_null_arg(), it can be reused.

If you do not object, I'll package it for you.

Regarding comment#4, please create a separate PR.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-08 20:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-08 20:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-08 20:35 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-08 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted for review here:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054499.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-08 20:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-08 20:35 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
  2020-06-11 18:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu @ 2020-06-08 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:02:48PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544
> 
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Created attachment 48708
>   --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48708&action=edit
> Cleaned up patch
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> since there is already a function invalid_null_arg(), it can be reused.
> 
> If you do not object, I'll package it for you.
> 

No problem.  I was aware of invalid_null_arg(), but
simply copied a nearby gfc_error().

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-08 20:35 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
@ 2020-06-11 18:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-14 12:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-14 13:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-11 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963

commit r11-1240-g7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date:   Thu Jun 11 20:29:45 2020 +0200

    PR fortran/95544 - Fix ICE in NULL() argument to intrinsics

    Fortran 2018: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than ASSOCIATED,
    NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  An EXPR_NULL is not a data
    object.  Add checks for intrinsics.

    2020-06-11  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
                Harald Anlauf  <anlauf@gmx.de>

    gcc/fortran/
            PR fortran/95544
            * check.c (invalid_null_arg): Rename to gfc_invalid_null_arg.
            (gfc_check_associated, gfc_check_kind, gfc_check_merge)
            (gfc_check_shape, gfc_check_size, gfc_check_spread)
            (gfc_check_transfer): Adjust.
            (gfc_check_len_lentrim, gfc_check_trim): Check for NULL() argument.
            * gfortran.h: Declare gfc_invalid_null_arg ().
            * intrinsic.c (check_arglist): Check for NULL() argument.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-11 18:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-14 12:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-14 13:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-14 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
<anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0feef39fe53fbc46c22ac0c745f91dbf96cdd00

commit r10-8302-gb0feef39fe53fbc46c22ac0c745f91dbf96cdd00
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date:   Thu Jun 11 20:29:45 2020 +0200

    PR fortran/95544 - Fix ICE in NULL() argument to intrinsics

    Fortran 2018: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than ASSOCIATED,
    NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  An EXPR_NULL is not a data
    object.  Add checks for intrinsics.

    2020-06-11  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
                Harald Anlauf  <anlauf@gmx.de>

    gcc/fortran/
            PR fortran/95544
            * check.c (invalid_null_arg): Rename to gfc_invalid_null_arg.
            (gfc_check_associated, gfc_check_kind, gfc_check_merge)
            (gfc_check_shape, gfc_check_size, gfc_check_spread)
            (gfc_check_transfer): Adjust.
            (gfc_check_len_lentrim, gfc_check_trim): Check for NULL() argument.
            * gfortran.h: Declare gfc_invalid_null_arg ().
            * intrinsic.c (check_arglist): Check for NULL() argument.

    (cherry picked from commit 7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494
  2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-14 12:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-14 13:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-14 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on master for GCC-11, and backported to 10-branch along with the fix
for pr93366, which is a prerequisite for this one.

Backport to 9-branch would require additional work.  Since this is not a
regression and an ICE on invalid, not done.  Closing.

Thanks for the report!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-14 13:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-04 18:16 [Bug fortran/95544] New: ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-06-04 18:17 ` [Bug fortran/95544] " gscfq@t-online.de
2020-06-04 21:09 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 21:27 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-04 23:06 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2020-06-08 20:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-08 20:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-08 20:35 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2020-06-11 18:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-14 12:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-14 13:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).