public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
@ 2020-06-16 18:06 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
  2020-06-17  6:32 ` [Bug testsuite/95706] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-06-16 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

            Bug ID: 95706
           Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
  Target Milestone: ---

g:a97e49a89d11b302b12ec319a3316ba78adca02a, r11-1349 

Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers
-fdiagnostics-color=never  -fdiagnostics-urls=never 
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers
-fdiagnostics-color=never  -fdiagnostics-urls=never    -O   -pedantic-errors -S
-o pr95690.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers
-fdiagnostics-color=never -fdiagnostics-urls=never -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never
-fdiagnostics-urls=never -O -pedantic-errors -S -o pr95690.s
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:6:0: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 5)
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
exceptions_enabled590613.cc    -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never 
-fdiagnostics-urls=never  -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never 
-fdiagnostics-urls=never  -S -o exceptions_enabled590613.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
exceptions_enabled590613.cc -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never
-fdiagnostics-urls=never -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never
-fdiagnostics-urls=never -S -o exceptions_enabled590613.s
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:6:0: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2020-06-17  6:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-17 14:54 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-17  6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why on earth does it show the error on line 6 on powerpc?!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
  2020-06-17  6:32 ` [Bug testsuite/95706] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-17 14:54 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
  2020-06-17 14:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-06-17 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
No idea, sorry.  Is that the problem?  Supposed to be an error but on a
different line?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
  2020-06-17  6:32 ` [Bug testsuite/95706] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-17 14:54 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2020-06-17 14:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de
  2020-06-18 14:24 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2020-06-17 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
> 
> --- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
> No idea, sorry.  Is that the problem?  Supposed to be an error but on a
> different line?

Yes.  On line 5, see the dg-error marker.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-17 14:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2020-06-18 14:24 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-18 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seen on arm and aarch64 too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-18 14:24 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-25 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 95893 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-02  6:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-25 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|11.0                        |10.1.1
      Known to fail|                            |10.1.1, 11.0

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now also on the branch.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-02  6:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-02  7:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-02  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dje at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 96023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-02  6:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-02  7:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-02  9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-02  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-07-02
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The interesting thing is that for a x86_64 -> aarch64-linux cross the error
_also_ appears on line 5:

> ./f951 -quiet /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 -o pr95690.s -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
/home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:0: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

so - what line number does the test report for a aarch64 -> x86_64-linux cross?

Note the error is emitted via output_constant via

4980        case REAL_TYPE:
4981          if (TREE_CODE (exp) != REAL_CST)
4982            error ("initializer for floating value is not a floating
constant");

so it depends on input_location (ick).  Now the question is where on earth
input_location has a dependence on the host ...

On x86_64 the respective location is set via

New value = 2147483652
expand_gimple_stmt (stmt=<gimple_call 0x7ffff69dd260>)
    at /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3847
3847      expand_gimple_stmt_1 (stmt);
(gdb) l
3842         it would be better if the diagnostic routines used the source
location
3843         embedded in the tree nodes rather than globals.  */
3844      if (gimple_has_location (stmt))
3845        input_location = gimple_location (stmt);
3846
3847      expand_gimple_stmt_1 (stmt);
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (stmt)
# .MEM_7 = VDEF <.MEM_6>
_gfortran_transfer_real_write (&dt_parm.0, &C.3905, 4);

which is where we expand C.3905 from.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-02  7:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-02  9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-02 21:08 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-02  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
David "fixed" this on trunk with the following, the testcase still fails on the
branch and of course we don't know why it exhibits this particular behavior.

commit b260e9123e3c80e0f4e18e6a6ac988d63042e741
Author: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 1 14:05:26 2020 -0400

    testsuite: Adjust gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 line number.

    gfortran produces associates a different line number for the same error
    message depending on x86 versus other architectures.  This patch adjusts
    the dg-error line number depending on the target.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

    2020-07-01  David Edelsohn  <dje.gcc@gmail.com>

            * gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90: Adjust dg-error line number.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-02  9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-02 21:08 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-02 21:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-02 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu        |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
               Host|powerpc64*-linux-gnu        |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
                 CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
              Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu        |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |                            |sparc-sun-solaris2.11

--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> David "fixed" this on trunk with the following, the testcase still fails on
> the branch and of course we don't know why it exhibits this particular
> behavior.

This change broke the test on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (both 32 and 64-bit):

+FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 6)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:0: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-02 21:08 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-02 21:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-07-03 10:12 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-02 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I added Solaris to the list of targets that see the error on line 5.  Add it
wherever your target sees it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-02 21:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-03 10:12 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2022-12-14 16:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2020-07-03 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I added Solaris to the list of targets that see the error on line 5.  Add it
> wherever your target sees it.

This has almost certainly nothing to do with Solaris per se, but just
piles hack upon hack without trying to understand why the test FAILs on
some targets, but not on others.

So far, we have failure reports for at least
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf,
s390x-ibm-linux-gnu, aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, arm-none-linux-gnueabi,
powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0, ia64-suse-linux-gnu, m68k-unknown-linux-gnu.

This needs to be analyzed, not hacked around.  Besides, the patch is
supposed to be posted to gcc-patches.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-03 10:12 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2022-12-14 16:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-04-02 15:41 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-04-29 16:35 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-14 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu,       |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |sparc-sun-solaris2.11       |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
                   |                            |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
   Last reconfirmed|2020-07-02 00:00:00         |2022-12-14
              Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu,       |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |sparc-sun-solaris2.11       |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
                   |                            |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
               Host|powerpc64*-linux-gnu,       |powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
                   |sparc-sun-solaris2.11       |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
                   |                            |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
                 CC|                            |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, error is also on line 5:

/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:21: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-12-14 16:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-04-02 15:41 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-04-29 16:35 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-02 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Executing on host:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/ 
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   
-fdiagnostics-plain-output  -fdiagnostics-plain-output    -O   -pedantic-errors
-S -o pr95690.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O -pedantic-errors -S -o
pr95690.s
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:21: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:21: Error:
initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails
  2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-04-02 15:41 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-04-29 16:35 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vital.had at gmail dot com @ 2023-04-29 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706

Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vital.had at gmail dot com

--- Comment #15 from Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> ---
Also happens on powerpc-apple-darwin with gcc13:

Executing on host:
/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/gcc/testsuite/gfortran1/../../gfortran
-B/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/gcc/testsuite/gfortran1/../../
-B/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/powerpc-apple-darwin10/./libgfortran/
/Users/svacchanda/GCC_sources/gcc-git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   
-fdiagnostics-plain-output  -fdiagnostics-plain-output    -O   -pedantic-errors
-S -o pr95690.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/gcc/testsuite/gfortran1/../../gfortran
-B/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/gcc/testsuite/gfortran1/../../
-B/Users/svacchanda/GCC_test/gcc_devel/powerpc-apple-darwin10/./libgfortran/
/Users/svacchanda/GCC_sources/gcc-git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -fdiagnostics-plain-output -O -pedantic-errors -S -o
pr95690.s

/Users/svacchanda/GCC_sources/gcc-git/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90:5:21:
Error: initializer for floating value is not a floating constant

compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-29 16:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-16 18:06 [Bug testsuite/95706] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-06-17  6:32 ` [Bug testsuite/95706] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-17 14:54 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-06-17 14:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2020-06-18 14:24 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-25 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02  6:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02  7:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02  9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02 21:08 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02 21:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-03 10:12 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2022-12-14 16:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-02 15:41 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-29 16:35 ` vital.had at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).