public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/95805] New: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2
@ 2020-06-21 20:47 gerald at pfeifer dot com
  2020-06-21 21:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/95805] " gerald at pfeifer dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2020-06-21 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95805

            Bug ID: 95805
           Summary: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many
                    arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: gerald at pfeifer dot com
                CC: rsandifo at sources dot redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 48766
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48766&action=edit
Relevant portion of the log file

This started in the 24 hours leading up to 2020-06-18-16:40UTC.

I am wondering whether this was triggered by 

commit 4e49b994de060d4a6c9318d0ed52ef038153426e
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 17 17:45:29 2020 +0100

    recog: Tweak insn_gen_fn::operator() definition

    Fixes a “left operand of comma has no effect” warning that some were
    seeing.  Also fixes a spurious ellipsis that Jonathan Wakely pointed
    out.

    2020-06-17  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>

    gcc/
            * coretypes.h (first_type): New alias template.
            * recog.h (insn_gen_fn::operator()): Use it instead of a decltype.
            Remove spurious “...” and split the function type out into a
typedef

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/95805] [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2
  2020-06-21 20:47 [Bug bootstrap/95805] New: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2 gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2020-06-21 21:10 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
  2020-06-22  8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-22 19:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2020-06-21 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95805

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Host|                            |i386-unknown-freebsd11.3

--- Comment #1 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
This is with clang 8.0.1 as bootstrap compiler.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/95805] [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2
  2020-06-21 20:47 [Bug bootstrap/95805] New: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2 gerald at pfeifer dot com
  2020-06-21 21:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/95805] " gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2020-06-22  8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-06-22 19:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-22  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95805

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|rsandifo at sources dot redhat.com |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
           Keywords|                            |build
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.0
            Version|unknown                     |11.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/95805] [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2
  2020-06-21 20:47 [Bug bootstrap/95805] New: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2 gerald at pfeifer dot com
  2020-06-21 21:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/95805] " gerald at pfeifer dot com
  2020-06-22  8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-22 19:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-22 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95805

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by g:20a2e6afa82c165bcd1a8749478e9402a25088a4.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-22 19:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-21 20:47 [Bug bootstrap/95805] New: [11 regression] gcc/recog.h:301:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2 gerald at pfeifer dot com
2020-06-21 21:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/95805] " gerald at pfeifer dot com
2020-06-22  8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-22 19:19 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).