public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value
@ 2020-06-23 21:01 msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-03 18:29 ` [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-23 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Bug ID: 95848
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the test case below, -Wuninitialized only detects the first instances of
using an uninitialized struct. It does not detect passing it as an argument by
value.
$ cat q.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall q.c
struct S { int i; };
struct S sf (void)
{
struct S s;
return s; // -Wuninitialized (good)
}
void fp (const struct S*);
void g (void)
{
struct S s;
fp (&s); // -Wuninitialized (good)
}
void fs (struct S);
void h (void)
{
struct S s;
fs (s); // missing -Wuninitialized
}
q.c: In function ‘sf’:
q.c:6:10: warning: ‘s’ is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
6 | return s; // -Wuninitialized (good)
| ^
q.c:5:12: note: ‘s’ declared here
5 | struct S s;
| ^
q.c: In function ‘g’:
q.c:14:3: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
14 | fp (&s); // -Wuninitialized (good)
| ^~~~~~~
q.c:9:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const struct S *’ to ‘fp’ declared here
9 | void fp (const struct S*);
| ^~
q.c:13:12: note: ‘s’ declared here
13 | struct S s;
| ^
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS)
2020-06-23 21:01 [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-03 18:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-12 17:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-03 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|missing -Wuninitialized |missing -Wuninitialized
|passing structs by value |passing structs by value
| |(VOPS)
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This uses VOPS, so it probably needs new code to handle that. Perhaps PR41953
h ()
{
struct S s;
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
[./example.cpp:7:3] # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
[./example.cpp:8:3] # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
[./example.cpp:8:6] # .MEM_2 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)>
fs (s); [tail call]
# .MEM_3 = VDEF <.MEM_2>
s ={v} {CLOBBER};
[./example.cpp:9:1] # VUSE <.MEM_3>
return;
}
There is no difference in the logs that explain why g() is treated differently,
so that must be a special case for const* parameters.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS)
2020-06-23 21:01 [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-03 18:29 ` [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-12 17:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 15:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 18:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-12 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0, 9.3.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2021-01-12
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No improvement in GCC 11, even though passing structs by reference to const
pointer/reference arguments is diagnosed:
$ cat a.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -Wextra -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout a.c
struct S { int i; };
void f (const struct S*);
void g (struct S);
void ff (void)
{
struct S s;
f (&s); // -Wmaybe-uninitialized (good)
}
void gg (void)
{
struct S s;
g (s); // missing warning
}
a.c: In function ‘ff’:
a.c:9:3: warning: ‘s’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
9 | f (&s); // -Wmaybe-uninitialized (good)
| ^~~~~~
a.c:3:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const struct S *’ to ‘f’ declared here
3 | void f (const struct S*);
| ^
a.c:8:12: note: ‘s’ declared here
8 | struct S s;
| ^
;; Function ff (ff, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1949, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)
void ff ()
{
struct S s;
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
f (&s);
s ={v} {CLOBBER};
return;
}
;; Function gg (gg, funcdef_no=1, decl_uid=1953, cgraph_uid=2, symbol_order=1)
void gg ()
{
struct S s;
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
g (s); [tail call]
s ={v} {CLOBBER};
return;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS)
2020-06-23 21:01 [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-03 18:29 ` [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-12 17:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-20 15:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 18:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-20 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Martin, it is not clear from the dumps what is the difference between the two
cases. Also, this warning triggers even with -O0, so it must come pretty
earlier even before we have VOPS. What is the difference at the level of
GIMPLE?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS)
2020-06-23 21:01 [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-20 15:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-20 18:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-20 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95848
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There's no code code to handle the last case. The first case is handled
because the local s is assigned to a temporary and there is code to detect
uninitialized sources of assignments. The second case is handled in the new
maybe_warn_pass_by_reference() function. The third case enters the function
but is excluded because the argument is passed by value and nothing else checks
passing non-SSA_NAME operands.
In the test case below passing the uninitialized i is diagnosed because i's an
SSA_NAME. Passing s isn't because it's not one.
maybe_warn_pass_by_reference() should handle this case as well (and be renamed
appropriately).
$ gcc -S -Wall -fdump-tree-ssa=/dev/stdout ../t.c
;; Function h (h, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1948, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)
void h ()
{
int i;
struct S s;
<bb 2> :
fs (s, i_2(D));
s ={v} {CLOBBER};
return;
}
../t.c: In function ‘h’:
../t.c:9:3: warning: ‘i’ is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
9 | fs (s, i);
| ^~~~~~~~~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-20 18:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-23 21:01 [Bug middle-end/95848] New: missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-03 18:29 ` [Bug middle-end/95848] missing -Wuninitialized passing structs by value (VOPS) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-12 17:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 15:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 18:23 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).