public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96184] [11/12 Regression] GCC treats "use of local variable with automatic storage from containing function" differently in versions Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:05:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-96184-4-DPkl0baEM6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-96184-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96184 Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|9.5 |11.0 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[9/10 Regression] GCC |[11/12 Regression] GCC |treats "use of local |treats "use of local |variable with automatic |variable with automatic |storage from containing |storage from containing |function" differently in |function" differently in |versions |versions --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think it's ill-formed, because the use of 'a' is in a function parameter scope, rather than in 'main'. The changes in whether we accepted this testcase were indeed by accident, as the way we handled 'this' injection changed whether parsing_nsdmi() returned true.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 20:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-13 12:41 [Bug c++/96184] New: " haoxintu at gmail dot com 2020-07-29 3:27 ` [Bug c++/96184] " haoxintu at gmail dot com 2020-11-04 15:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-10 6:56 ` [Bug c++/96184] [9/10 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-10 20:05 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-09-13 2:48 ` [Bug c++/96184] [11/12 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-13 2:50 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-08 10:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-29 10:03 ` [Bug c++/96184] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-96184-4-DPkl0baEM6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).