public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14 Regression] New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since r11-959
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:49:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96564-4-EQEKtiV5y2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564

Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So I think we could solve this with a bit of help from the alias oracle.  We
have  the routine ptrs_compare_unequal, but points-to-null is going to get in
the way.

I think VRP and DOM have enough information to rule out NULL for both objects
in question.  So if we could query the points-to information, ignoring NULL
then we could likely solve this particular bug.

Essentially VRP or DOM would prove NULL isn't in the set of possible values at
the comparison point.  Then we query the alias information ignoring NULL. 
Voila we compute a static result for the comparison of the two pointers and the
problematical block becomes unreachable and the bogus warning goes away.

Richi, any thoughts in viability of such an API?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-10 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-11  7:30 [Bug middle-end/96564] New: New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since GCC >10 stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2020-08-11  9:27 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-11  9:47 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] [11 Regression] New maybe use of uninitialized variable warning since r11-959 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-11 17:10 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-11 17:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-25  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14  9:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-11 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:39 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28  7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21  7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-14  5:00 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-10 22:49 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-03-11 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-11 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-11 15:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2024-03-12  7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-16 11:23 ` [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-16 12:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-16 14:27 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-96564-4-EQEKtiV5y2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).